We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Can this situation still counter as first time buyer?

taihai
Posts: 23 Forumite

Hello,
If a house is bought under two persons' names (e.g. property bought as a couple) and both never had a house before, does it mean that now both will not be counted as a first-time buyer anymore?
If so, that is a bit 'wasteful' in a way because it could have been that both could buy two different properties separately as a first-time buyer and they could enjoy first time buyer's benefits separately?
Best regards,
If a house is bought under two persons' names (e.g. property bought as a couple) and both never had a house before, does it mean that now both will not be counted as a first-time buyer anymore?
If so, that is a bit 'wasteful' in a way because it could have been that both could buy two different properties separately as a first-time buyer and they could enjoy first time buyer's benefits separately?
Best regards,
0
Comments
-
Yes. And anyway, it wouldn't work if they're married, and they're only going to be able to pull that trick if either of them can afford to buy in their sole names without the other being at least a beneficial owner. Which generally isn't what happens anyway.1
-
Neither would not be counted as a first time buyer for SDLT purposes when they buy their next property. Also if an FTB is buying with non FTB full SDLT still applies.
Some lenders may consider you an FTB if several years have passed since you last owned a property.1 -
Yes it does. But presumably by buying together you are getting a more valuable house so the saving on stamp duty (presuming this is what you mean by ‘first time buyer benefits’) as a % will be similar.
2 -
Nope, both are not considered first time buyers if they have been named on the deeds.1
-
ele_91 said:Yes it does. But presumably by buying together you are getting a more valuable house so the saving on stamp duty (presuming this is what you mean by ‘first time buyer benefits’) as a % will be similar.
0 -
taihai said:ele_91 said:Yes it does. But presumably by buying together you are getting a more valuable house so the saving on stamp duty (presuming this is what you mean by ‘first time buyer benefits’) as a % will be similar.0
-
taihai said:
If so, that is a bit 'wasteful' in a way because it could have been that both could buy two different properties separately as a first-time buyer and they could enjoy first time buyer's benefits separately?
E.g. If each of you individually can afford to buy a house for £150k (let's say £30k saved + £120k mortgage), then together you can presumably afford a £300k property.
Stamp duty saved when buying 2 £150k properties as first time buyers: £1,000 (£500 on each property)
Stamp duty saved when buying 1 £300k house as a first time buyer: £5,0002 -
As far as all government schemes are concerned (stamp duty, LISA, HTB, etc), being a first time buyer is like being a virgin. If you have ever dabbled, you lost that status forever, even if it was brief and unsatisfactory and you don't think it's fair to count it. If you have to ask, you aren't one.
As far as lenders, builders, etc, are concerned, being a first time buyer is like being a doctor. Standards vary dramatically, and some people get to call themselves that on the thinnest of reeds, but it's only for that narrow purpose. You might get that introductory mortgage rate, but you can't get reduced SDLT, just like calling yourself Dr Smith because of your DPhil may work socially, but won't let you write prescriptions.3 -
taihai said:ele_91 said:Yes it does. But presumably by buying together you are getting a more valuable house so the saving on stamp duty (presuming this is what you mean by ‘first time buyer benefits’) as a % will be similar.
So what is the advantage if using twice? (To potentially head off possible response you can't use LISA towards a BTL).
Surely you would just end up with two houses worth ~the same as the one you could buy together since each house would be bought with a mortgage using one salary.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards