We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
FTB: Purchase small cheaper flat OR a large Shared Ownership

aadisa
Posts: 2 Newbie

Hello,
I'm new here so please excuse me if I'm breaking any rules.
We're first time buyers looking to settle down and own a small flat. My question is this - for our budget we have 2 options
- buy a smaller 1 bed, cash buy flat in a remote/non-central location
- buy a larger 2-3 bed flat with 25% shared ownership in a central location
Do you think we should go for the smaller cash buy option vs the 25% shared ownership?
0
Comments
-
I think the trick for option 2 is in the wording, "buying" a flat where actually you are only buying 1/4 of it and paying rent on top.doesn't qualify as buying in my book.
im not sure why either option is a good idea if you plan to sell again in just 2 years time. How do the monthly costs compare to renting? Add all other incidental purchase costs in as well to make ita fair comparison.As to letting out the flat, have you seen the stories in here of bad tenants? Letting is a High risk option with most likely a very limited income. Much more complex and costly when you are overseas.1 -
AnotherJoe said:I think the trick for option 2 is in the wording, "buying" a flat where actually you are only buying 1/4 of it and paying rent on top.doesn't qualify as buying in my book.
im not sure why either option is a good idea if you plan to sell again in just 2 years time. How do the monthly costs compare to renting? Add all other incidental purchase costs in as well to make ita fair comparison.As to letting out the flat, have you seen the stories in here of bad tenants? Letting is a High risk option with most likely a very limited income. Much more complex and costly when you are overseas.Appreciate your advice. Our move is uncertain and if we move overseas it will only be for a few years. So I guess buying makes sense for us. I'll read up on the tenant stories.On a separate note, do you have any advice on buying in a high-rise vs a small building with 2-3 floors?Thank you0 -
Do you have a specific unmortgageable flat in mind? Look out in case what is making it unmortgageable - and cheaper- means future bills for the owner to improve it to mortgageable standard.
But a banker, engaged at enormous expense,Had the whole of their cash in his care.
Lewis Carroll0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards