We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Fluid balance transfer scam (just to get new customers?)
lanarkshire
Posts: 5 Forumite
in Credit cards
Has anyone actually been able to balance transfer to Fluid 0% card?
We used MSE link to sign up, but mysteriously unable to balance transfer with Fluid claiming "address mis-match".
However 3 colleagues have now had same made-up address mismatch error despite all 4 of us checking old credit card and new card address are letter for letter the exact same.
Online chat fobs you off saying nothing they can do. They refuse to process it manually over the phone.
Can someone at MSE investigate if this offer on the MSE website of 0% balance transfer is actually just a scam for Fluid to get new customers??
We used MSE link to sign up, but mysteriously unable to balance transfer with Fluid claiming "address mis-match".
However 3 colleagues have now had same made-up address mismatch error despite all 4 of us checking old credit card and new card address are letter for letter the exact same.
Online chat fobs you off saying nothing they can do. They refuse to process it manually over the phone.
Can someone at MSE investigate if this offer on the MSE website of 0% balance transfer is actually just a scam for Fluid to get new customers??
0
Comments
-
Doesn't seem like a very good scam.
Suck them in with a balance transfer offer that they can't actually use? And refuse to offer help when contacted? Not a very good impression to give to new customers, is it?6 -
As with all 'scams', it's not a scam.6
-
I don't understand this comment.Deleted_User said:As with all 'scams', it's not a scam.
Do you mean it like a "feature" of card rather than a dishonest practice?2 -
No.
I mean that there are errors, there are mistakes, there are misunderstandings, there are things that people don't understand. But every time someone declares a scam, it's not a scam, as that's a criminal act and end up in the company being closed down.
It's also not a feature that would be built into a product.7 -
Having had a whole series of long addresses and various transfer type things which require the address to match I've learnt a long time ago its not simply the case of a letter by letter match but a field by field match. So one company holds the "Flat 1" in "flat number" and "5 Beech Avenue" in "Address 1" whereas the other company holds the flat in "Address 1" and the street in "Address 2" when the address is printed they look identical but when they compare at field level they don't match.lanarkshire said:However 3 colleagues have now had same made-up address mismatch error despite all 4 of us checking old credit card and new card address are letter for letter the exact same.2 -
I would have thought this is vastly prevented by having customer enter postcode then select house/flat number or name from drop down box.Sandtree said:
Having had a whole series of long addresses and various transfer type things which require the address to match I've learnt a long time ago its not simply the case of a letter by letter match but a field by field match. So one company holds the "Flat 1" in "flat number" and "5 Beech Avenue" in "Address 1" whereas the other company holds the flat in "Address 1" and the street in "Address 2" when the address is printed they look identical but when they compare at field level they don't match.lanarkshire said:However 3 colleagues have now had same made-up address mismatch error despite all 4 of us checking old credit card and new card address are letter for letter the exact same.
Although, occasionally a particular flat or house doesn't come up and then you have to enter everything manually.
0 -
It is certainly helps but by no means eliminates the problem but then these days there is Royal Mail's PAF file isnt the only possible source of address data. Personally still had a lot of issues with addresses that had a "dependent thoroughfare". Plus just because they source the data from the PAF file doesnt mean they use the same data structure to hold it.OceanSound said:
I would have thought this is vastly prevented by having customer enter postcode then select house/flat number or name from drop down box.
Although, occasionally a particular flat or house doesn't come up and then you have to enter everything manually.2 -
I once tried to use a Money Supermarket product/service - entered my postcode, selected my address from the dropdown list displayed and was then presented with a message that my address was too long to fit in their fields.OceanSound said:I would have thought this is vastly prevented by having customer enter postcode then select house/flat number or name from drop down box.
Although, occasionally a particular flat or house doesn't come up and then you have to enter everything manually.0 -
Which would be fine if they all used the same systems.OceanSound said:
I would have thought this is vastly prevented by having customer enter postcode then select house/flat number or name from drop down box.
Although, occasionally a particular flat or house doesn't come up and then you have to enter everything manually.
Which they do not. So @Sandtree hits the nail bang on the head.
All you could do is ask Fluid what the issue is, and how to correct it.
Life in the slow lane2 -
Asked Fluid, and they can't help.All you could do is ask Fluid what the issue is, and how to correct it.
Unusual 4 users all have same issue?1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards