We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Do I really need a 'Gigabit' network switch for everyday use?
ferry
Posts: 2,017 Forumite
in Techie Stuff
Hi, I need some advice, I need more ethernet ports and note that a network swich will sole this for me. I have seen a 2nd hand 24 port one that supports 10/100 but no mention of 'gigabit' capability.
Do I really need this if I only running a router, CCTV dvr and Playstations and maybe a couple Sky Q boxes from it, will I see any benefit for a 'gigbit' spec switch?
Thank you
Do I really need this if I only running a router, CCTV dvr and Playstations and maybe a couple Sky Q boxes from it, will I see any benefit for a 'gigbit' spec switch?
Thank you
:j
0
Comments
-
Hi
Dunno.
If it is a longer term investment I would also consider Power over Ethernet for Remote/Extra cameras.
https://www.currys.co.uk/gbuk/computing-accessories/networking/network-routers-and-switches/network-switches/tp-link-tl-sf1008p-network-switch-8-port-10024572-pdt.html
https://www.amazon.co.uk/NETGEAR-GS116UK-16-Port-Gigabit-Unmanaged/dp/B0007SQEPK
You could start with an 8 / 16 port and add another if wanted.Forum, Agin 'em or Just Neutral?1 -
My understanding is that if your network switch has a slower speed rating than your internet speed, it will the switch will throttle anything going through it higher than it's rating. If your switch has a higher capacity than your network speed you'll see no difference. A 10/100 switch will be fine as long as you don't need speeds higher than 100 Mbs (which is fine for most things unless you have multiple simultaneous heavy users), although depending on the price difference you might as well consider future-proofing your setup.2
-
Gigabit was about £3 dearer last time i bought a switch .
1 -
Thanks guys for the help. Also are you able to 'piggy back' 2 x network switces from one router?:j0
-
yes, each will take up 1x ethernet port on your router, most routers have 4 ports (don't try and daisy-chain one switch off the other)ferry said:Thanks guys for the help. Also are you able to 'piggy back' 2 x network switces from one router?......Gettin' There, Wherever There is......
I have a dodgy "i" key, so ignore spelling errors due to "i" issues, ...I blame Apple
2 -
If you have devices that share data between them on the local network then faster ports will enable faster communications, so I'd agree that gb port switches should be the preference if the cost addition isn't an issue.PRAISETHESUN said:My understanding is that if your network switch has a slower speed rating than your internet speed, it will the switch will throttle anything going through it higher than it's rating. If your switch has a higher capacity than your network speed you'll see no difference. A 10/100 switch will be fine as long as you don't need speeds higher than 100 Mbs (which is fine for most things unless you have multiple simultaneous heavy users), although depending on the price difference you might as well consider future-proofing your setup.
Jenni x3 -
It's highly likely that you won't see a difference between a Gigabit and a Fast Ethernet switch. Having said that, this is not something you buy on a daily basis, and it will stay with you even if you decide to change internet provider or change home. The price difference isn't massive, I would definitely go for a Gigabit one.
In terms of internet connection, if you haven't got full fibre, 100 Mbps is more than enough, but then again if fibre comes to your property and you decide to switch, you'd be already covered.
P.S. If you don't have enough ports on the router, you can always daisy-chain two switches, if a 8-port one is not enough.1 -
GunJack said:
yes, each will take up 1x ethernet port on your router, most routers have 4 ports (don't try and daisy-chain one switch off the other)ferry said:Thanks guys for the help. Also are you able to 'piggy back' 2 x network switces from one router?
Switches can be daisy chained, the spanning tree protocol is designed for it. It's hubs that create problems with daisy chaining, but it must be at least 15 years since you could by those new.
Proud member of the wokerati, though I don't eat tofu.Home is where my books are.Solar PV 5.2kWp system, SE facing, >1% shading, installed March 2019.Mortgage free July 20230 -
The Spanning Tree Protocol actually works to avoid having loops in a network, but at the same time allowing some kind of redundancy. Switches will need to support it.onomatopoeia99 said:GunJack said:
yes, each will take up 1x ethernet port on your router, most routers have 4 ports (don't try and daisy-chain one switch off the other)ferry said:Thanks guys for the help. Also are you able to 'piggy back' 2 x network switces from one router?
Switches can be daisy chained, the spanning tree protocol is designed for it. It's hubs that create problems with daisy chaining, but it must be at least 15 years since you could by those new.
If you daisy-chain two switches with one single cable, there's no need for STP.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


