We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Ex council fence on my land, can I remove?

Options
2»

Comments

  • Sandtree
    Sandtree Posts: 10,628 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    casper_gutman said:
    The deeds won't tell you anything about ownership of the fence, just about who is responsible for maintaining the boundary. You can put a fence along a boundary even if you don't have responsibility for it, and it doesn't become the property of the person on the other side just because the deeds say they should have put a fence up.
    I appreciate the T plans only show who's responsible for maintenance but it would, you'd assume, generally follow that those that are to maintain it are most likely to be the owners.

    As an aside @casper_gutman, if the deeds make it clear that Party A is responsible for maintenance but Party B erected the boundary structure and therefore its B's property. What obligations does that put on A to preserve/maintain B's property? Is there grounds for appeal if B erected something that is very high maintenance whereas A would have been happy with a basic/easy panel fence?
  • Davesnave
    Davesnave Posts: 34,741 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 12 June 2021 at 7:58AM
    bris said:
    Going by the picture a dropped kerb would be very unlikely as it's going in from the side over this path and not from the front.
    I don't think there's a law that says a side vehicular entrance is unacceptable, but there may be covenants running with the land designed to prevent alterations to the design of the estate. Also, we can't see the visibility issues that might exist or proximity to road junctions etc.
    The worst feature of this site for granting vehicles access may be the intersection of the public footpath and pavement. I doubt if it's a goer myself.

  • Sandtree said:
    ... What obligations does that put on A to preserve/maintain B's property? Is there grounds for appeal if B erected something that is very high maintenance whereas A would have been happy with a basic/easy panel fence?
    As far as I know A would have no obligation to maintain B's property. A just has to ensure there is a suitable means of marking the boundary. Practically, if B has erected a fence A could probably do nothing at all. If B tried to insist that A needed to meet their obligations, they could mark the boundary perfectly well by some other means, e.g. a chain hung between posts.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.