We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Do I cancel car insurance or not

arsenalboy
arsenalboy Posts: 457 Forumite
Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper
I have just given our second car to a relative because it is not being used anymore. Proper V5C transfer has been done and relative has insured car.
Because it is an old car our insurance was very cheap at 137 per annum. However, the breakdown of the premium is stacked in insurers favour because it included an arrangement fee as well as NCD protection and legal cover. Because the premium was paid upfront there technically is a 3 month refund due but that is only £17.
Now here is the problem as they charge a £55 cancellation fee which would mean I would end up paying £38 i.e., 55 less 17.
So the obvious thing to do is just let the policy run down and obviously not renew.
But what is the legal implication of having insurance on a car you no longer have and is there a chance this could be picked up by APNR which would show 2 policies on the car?

Comments

  • GrumpyDil
    GrumpyDil Posts: 2,252 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    General advice is to cancel the insurance. Have you checked if there is any way to do this online as some companies allow on line updates FOC.
    If not have you asked if they would waive the fee and just cancel it down and use the refund as their fee? 
  • Sandtree
    Sandtree Posts: 10,628 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    The implication is that they remain the RTA insurer of the vehicle meaning if your relative were to have a fault accident your insurer would still have to pay out to any third party. This would mean you have two breach of contracts:
    1) Non-disclosure - you haven't informed them of the change of ownership, registered keeper, where the vehicle is kept etc
    2) Permitting a non-insured driver

    As such the insurer would be likely to void the policy for fraud and then pursue you personally for the monies it has had to pay out to the third party. You'd have to declare the fact you've had a policy cancelled to all future insurers for the rest of your life. According to another poster on the Insurance part of the forum, their cancelled insurance has resulted in their car insurance to go from £300 to £5,000... they're yet to see the impact on their Home cover.

    Obviously this is an outside chance but this is the risk you are running to save £38. Alternatively, don't do the transfer/gift until the day your insurance runs out (though imagine the extra road tax paid will be more than that
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I have just given our second car to a relative because it is not being used anymore. Proper V5C transfer has been done and relative has insured car.
    Because it is an old car our insurance was very cheap at 137 per annum. However, the breakdown of the premium is stacked in insurers favour because it included an arrangement fee as well as NCD protection and legal cover. Because the premium was paid upfront there technically is a 3 month refund due but that is only £17.
    Now here is the problem as they charge a £55 cancellation fee which would mean I would end up paying £38 i.e., 55 less 17.
    So the obvious thing to do is just let the policy run down and obviously not renew.
    But what is the legal implication of having insurance on a car you no longer have and is there a chance this could be picked up by APNR which would show 2 policies on the car?
    ANPR will only show one policy - because the MID database only has one policy-of-record, and that's the first one.

    If your relative does a runner from an accident, or doesn't insure the car, your policy will be the one that gets the claim.
    Even if your relative does do everything by the book, you would still need to declare an accident on a car insured under your policy - and there is the likelihood that the two insurers would split the payout.

    https://www.visordown.com/news/general/biker-may-be-forced-pay-thousands-after-banned-new-owner-has-fatal-crash
  • jimjames
    jimjames Posts: 19,247 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    It may be possible to leave the policy to end but without cancelling it and remove the vehicle. I did this in a similar situation when the cancellation was more than the refund.
    Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.