We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Help Needed - Defence for PPS PCN -WS Stage
Comments
-
Le_Kirk said:Your witness statement (WS) backs up and supports your defence with evidence and the story (sequence of events) and only you know the story. If the claimant's WS is claiming something that is not factually true, you point this out in your WS with evidence to back up what you state and to disprove what the claimant states.
There are good examples of recent WSs by @jrhys and @Nosy.
I have come up with a draft, appreciate if you can check it esp with yellow highlights. ThanksCoupon-mad said:
hxxps://www.dropbox.com/s/t60jmj3q05rnxmv/WitnessStatement%20v0.1.pdf?dl=0
0 -
Your link made live: -
https://www.dropbox.com/s/t60jmj3q05rnxmv/WitnessStatement v0.1.pdf?dl=0
Looks good and refutes the claimants claims; assuming you put that in your defence you are doing the right thing in backing it up and providing evidence.2 -
Thanks, is there anything that i can add for the Keeper Liability?Le_Kirk said:Your link made live: -
https://www.dropbox.com/s/t60jmj3q05rnxmv/WitnessStatement v0.1.pdf?dl=0
Looks good and refutes the claimants claims; assuming you put that in your defence you are doing the right thing in backing it up and providing evidence.
Also is the (legal) language correct for the yellow highlights.0 -
If you want the legal language checking you will have to ask a solicitor as we are not allowed to give "advice" just our opinions and IANAL. If by keeper liability you mean the keeper is not liable as the PPC's claim is not POFA compliant and you have it in your defence then you would want to add something about POFA and have the relevant parts of it in your evidence section.Goodboy18 said:Thanks, is there anything that i can add for the Keeper Liability?
Also is the (legal) language correct for the yellow highlights.1 -
do you recall any other WS having that, I can grab something from there?Le_Kirk said:
If you want the legal language checking you will have to ask a solicitor as we are not allowed to give "advice" just our opinions and IANAL. If by keeper liability you mean the keeper is not liable as the PPC's claim is not POFA compliant and you have it in your defence then you would want to add something about POFA and have the relevant parts of it in your evidence section.Goodboy18 said:Thanks, is there anything that i can add for the Keeper Liability?
Also is the (legal) language correct for the yellow highlights.0 -
Thousands over the years. You don't need to copy someone's words though.
Presumably, you already know why the PCN is 'non POFA' and which part of Schedule 4 to quote, if you considered this at defence stage? That's all you spell out for the Judge and it's important you understand it (not us) because you're the one who has to explain the wording omissions or PCN service timeline to the Judge.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1 -
Para 26 - unless I am missing something this para is the first time that the names of Judges Jackson and Hickinbottom are mentioned:-"26. Secondly, given the specificity of the conclusions of Judges Jackson and Hickinbottom, and their direct relevance to this claim,............"Is there perhaps supposed to be a para regarding the Judges involvement prior to 26?1
-
1505grandad said:Para 26 - unless I am missing something this para is the first time that the names of Judges Jackson and Hickinbottom are mentioned:-"26. Secondly, given the specificity of the conclusions of Judges Jackson and Hickinbottom, and their direct relevance to this claim,............"Is there perhaps supposed to be a para regarding the Judges involvement prior to 26?
this is in the jrhys ws template and it seems that these two judges have striked off lots of cases for claiming double recovery0 -
Another quick one - my WS is almost ready - do I need to send anything else apart from the WS (like Defence, etc) to the court and Claimant?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

