PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Inherited property; buying out siblings; what is the correct 'consideration' value??

Looking for some advice, please.
My partner's mother passed away and probate was granted in 2018. The estate will be equally shared with her 3 siblings under the terms of the will and my partner will therefore inherit 1/4 of the estate which includes the family home.    My partner and I have agreed with the siblings that we will buy out their share of the family home.and we have engaged a conveyancing solicitor to complete the transaction.  The transaction will involve us paying 3/4 of the agreed house value (in line with current full market of £713k), which will then be distributed equally to the other 3 siblings through the probate case handler

We have been advised by the HMRC SDLT helpline that the SDLT will be based on the transaction money paid - i.e. 3/4 of the house value.  However, our conveyancing solicitor has already sent the TR1 land registry form to the seller (the estate of the deceased) with the full value of the house listed as the 'consideration value' in panel 8 of the TR1 form.  We are concerned that this may not be correct and may have an impact on the Stamp Duty we end up paying.  HMRC helpline also advised that a SDLT1 form will also need to be completed (we have yet to see this from our conveyancer).  We are becoming increasingly concerned that our conveyancing solicitor may not be recording the transaction correctly which will have consequences for the stamp duty due and may also have consequences for the capital gains tax for which we will be liable for in the future.

The questions we have are:
  1. is the advice we have received from HMRC SDLT helpline correct? - i.e. stamp duty only applies to the money being paid; 3/4 of house value, not full value.  (This I believe is due to the fact that the inherited share that my partner has in the property is exempt from SDLT).
  2. what 'consideration' value should be placed in the TR1 Land registry form [at location panel 8]? - 3/4 of the house value?, or the full value?
  3. should any additional information be entered in panel 8 of the TR1 form?
  4. in the SDLT1 form that follows, what value (consideration) should be placed in Box 10? - does it have to be the same as the consideration value entered in the TR1 form? (If, as I understand it, the SDLT1 form effectively sets the stamp duty tax that will be charged, then the consideration value for the SDLT1 form would be 3/4 of the house value, but this clearly would not match the consideration value already entered by our solicitor in the TR1!)
I would very much appreciate any guidance you can offer - thank you.

Comments

  • ojb_28
    ojb_28 Posts: 5 Forumite
    First Post
    I realise this is quite a detailed query. Any guidance on any of the points would be most welcome, or a
     recommendation for someone expert in this area to speak with?


    Many thanks.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    So this was three years ago? And nothings been done yet? CGT may be payable by the estate assuming the house has gone up in price a lot in the last few years.
    Is there any other money in the rest of the estate which could be traded for the equity to avoid anyone needing to buy anyone out?
  • Grumpy_chap
    Grumpy_chap Posts: 18,402 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Why do you think the inherited share is exempt?
    Is this your only property /replacing main home, or is second property rate applicable?
  • SDLT_Geek
    SDLT_Geek Posts: 2,915 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    ojb_28 said:
    Looking for some advice, please.
    My partner's mother passed away and probate was granted in 2018. The estate will be equally shared with her 3 siblings under the terms of the will and my partner will therefore inherit 1/4 of the estate which includes the family home.    My partner and I have agreed with the siblings that we will buy out their share of the family home.and we have engaged a conveyancing solicitor to complete the transaction.  The transaction will involve us paying 3/4 of the agreed house value (in line with current full market of £713k), which will then be distributed equally to the other 3 siblings through the probate case handler

    We have been advised by the HMRC SDLT helpline that the SDLT will be based on the transaction money paid - i.e. 3/4 of the house value.  However, our conveyancing solicitor has already sent the TR1 land registry form to the seller (the estate of the deceased) with the full value of the house listed as the 'consideration value' in panel 8 of the TR1 form.  We are concerned that this may not be correct and may have an impact on the Stamp Duty we end up paying.  HMRC helpline also advised that a SDLT1 form will also need to be completed (we have yet to see this from our conveyancer).  We are becoming increasingly concerned that our conveyancing solicitor may not be recording the transaction correctly which will have consequences for the stamp duty due and may also have consequences for the capital gains tax for which we will be liable for in the future.

    The questions we have are:
    1. is the advice we have received from HMRC SDLT helpline correct? - i.e. stamp duty only applies to the money being paid; 3/4 of house value, not full value.  (This I believe is due to the fact that the inherited share that my partner has in the property is exempt from SDLT).
    2. what 'consideration' value should be placed in the TR1 Land registry form [at location panel 8]? - 3/4 of the house value?, or the full value?
    3. should any additional information be entered in panel 8 of the TR1 form?
    4. in the SDLT1 form that follows, what value (consideration) should be placed in Box 10? - does it have to be the same as the consideration value entered in the TR1 form? (If, as I understand it, the SDLT1 form effectively sets the stamp duty tax that will be charged, then the consideration value for the SDLT1 form would be 3/4 of the house value, but this clearly would not match the consideration value already entered by our solicitor in the TR1!)
    I would very much appreciate any guidance you can offer - thank you.
    There are different ways in which this can be done.

    Route 1
    OP's partner is first assented out the 1/4 share.  OP and partner can then buy the other 3/4 shares.  That might be from the executors, if those shares have not yet been assented out or from the siblings.  The price could then sensibly be stated as 3/4 of £713K.
    Route 2
    OP's partner buys the whole of the property from the executors who then divide out the money between the four beneficiaries, so OP's partner "gets back" 1/4 of the price.  Then it would be correct for the TR1 to state the full value of £713K and for the SDLT to be assessed on this figure.

  • ojb_28
    ojb_28 Posts: 5 Forumite
    First Post
    So this was three years ago? And nothings been done yet? CGT may be payable by the estate assuming the house has gone up in price a lot in the last few years.
    Is there any other money in the rest of the estate which could be traded for the equity to avoid anyone needing to buy anyone out?
    Thanks Another Joe,

    Yes - probate was granted 3 years ago. The property needed work before being marketed, but this has not been since hence we are buying out the siblings to get it moving.

    Probate case handler is aware of need for CGT to be paid the increase in value that has occured since death.

    There is very little money beyond house value in the estate.
  • ojb_28
    ojb_28 Posts: 5 Forumite
    First Post
    Why do you think the inherited share is exempt?
    Is this your only property /replacing main home, or is second property rate applicable?
    Thank you for your reply, Grumpy_chap.

    I researched the .Gov website and found the SDLT Manual. In section SDLTM00570, it refers to FA03/SCH3/PARA3A;

    "Acquisition of a property by a person in or towards the satisfaction of his (or her) entitlement under or in relation to the will of a deceased person is exempt from SDLT."

    This property is not a main home, so the SDLT that applies will be at the second home rate (hence my wish to secure completion before the end of June).

  • ojb_28
    ojb_28 Posts: 5 Forumite
    First Post
    SDLT_Geek said:
    ojb_28 said:
    Looking for some advice, please.
    My partner's mother passed away and probate was granted in 2018. The estate will be equally shared with her 3 siblings under the terms of the will and my partner will therefore inherit 1/4 of the estate which includes the family home.    My partner and I have agreed with the siblings that we will buy out their share of the family home.and we have engaged a conveyancing solicitor to complete the transaction.  The transaction will involve us paying 3/4 of the agreed house value (in line with current full market of £713k), which will then be distributed equally to the other 3 siblings through the probate case handler

    We have been advised by the HMRC SDLT helpline that the SDLT will be based on the transaction money paid - i.e. 3/4 of the house value.  However, our conveyancing solicitor has already sent the TR1 land registry form to the seller (the estate of the deceased) with the full value of the house listed as the 'consideration value' in panel 8 of the TR1 form.  We are concerned that this may not be correct and may have an impact on the Stamp Duty we end up paying.  HMRC helpline also advised that a SDLT1 form will also need to be completed (we have yet to see this from our conveyancer).  We are becoming increasingly concerned that our conveyancing solicitor may not be recording the transaction correctly which will have consequences for the stamp duty due and may also have consequences for the capital gains tax for which we will be liable for in the future.

    The questions we have are:
    1. is the advice we have received from HMRC SDLT helpline correct? - i.e. stamp duty only applies to the money being paid; 3/4 of house value, not full value.  (This I believe is due to the fact that the inherited share that my partner has in the property is exempt from SDLT).
    2. what 'consideration' value should be placed in the TR1 Land registry form [at location panel 8]? - 3/4 of the house value?, or the full value?
    3. should any additional information be entered in panel 8 of the TR1 form?
    4. in the SDLT1 form that follows, what value (consideration) should be placed in Box 10? - does it have to be the same as the consideration value entered in the TR1 form? (If, as I understand it, the SDLT1 form effectively sets the stamp duty tax that will be charged, then the consideration value for the SDLT1 form would be 3/4 of the house value, but this clearly would not match the consideration value already entered by our solicitor in the TR1!)
    I would very much appreciate any guidance you can offer - thank you.
    There are different ways in which this can be done.

    Route 1
    OP's partner is first assented out the 1/4 share.  OP and partner can then buy the other 3/4 shares.  That might be from the executors, if those shares have not yet been assented out or from the siblings.  The price could then sensibly be stated as 3/4 of £713K.
    Route 2
    OP's partner buys the whole of the property from the executors who then divide out the money between the four beneficiaries, so OP's partner "gets back" 1/4 of the price.  Then it would be correct for the TR1 to state the full value of £713K and for the SDLT to be assessed on this figure.

    Thank you very much for your reply, SDLT_geek. We believe we are following Route1. The probate solicitor has actioned an "Equitable Transfer" so that the property value has been assented to the 4 beneficiaries, including my partner.  He has also confirmed to the conveyancer the amount for transaction he is expecting is for 3/4 of the value of the property.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 258K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.