PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Transfer of Equity and HIgher Rate Stamp Duty

My Sister is currently in the process of a Transfer of Equity from her partner for the house they shared for 20+ years. During that time my Sister and I inherited a property which we have renovated and now Rent out. When I moved house in 2017 my Solicitor tried to get me to pay the increased Stamp Duty but I highlighted that this was a change in my Main Residence and so the increased Stamp Duty was not payable which they agreed with. I believed the same would apply to my Sister as the ToE relates to her Main Residence but her Solicitor is adamant that she needs to pay the increased figure as she is not Selling and Buying a new Main Residence.

Though it's irrelevant with Higher Rate Stamp Duty the Consideration value is £153k

Hoping someone on here may have been through a similar process or may be able to offer some insight as Google and the Government web site are both coming up short on equivalent scenarios

Comments

  • SDLT_Geek
    SDLT_Geek Posts: 2,929 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    There might be a different rule which will save the sister from the 3% surcharge to SDLT in this case.
    There is a rule that if someone has lived in a property as their only or main residence throughout the whole of the previous three years, and already had at least a 25% share, then acquiring a further share is free of the 3% surcharge.
    Are those the circumstances here? 
  • Yes they have both lived there since 2007 (at the latest) and owned it Jointly so yes that's correct here. Is this documented somewhere as I imagine her Solicitor will want some guidance before being satisfied to submit SDLT forms.
    Thanks for your help and any information you can give us
  • That's excellent. Thanks so much for your help
    I've passed on the details to my Sister and she is over the moon as you would expect
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.