We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Buyer offering 5% deposit on exchange whereas I am paying 10%

Shookup
Posts: 37 Forumite

I am going through the process of selling my house and buying a new one. My buyer wants to give a 5% deposit on exchange. I have offered a 10% deposit on exchange to the people whose property I am buying under the advice of my solicitor and the belief that this is the norm.
Could this cause any problems if, god forbid, someone had to pull out after exchange happened? Awful things can happen, such as people become seriously ill or suffer a bereavement. What if my buyers suffered some dreadful event and had to pull out after exchange? I assume they would then owe me 5% of my sale price. However, would I then have to pull out of my house purchase and pay the people I am buying a house off 10%? This doesn't seem fair. What should I do? Should I ask them to up their deposit to 10%? Should I ask if I can change my deposit to 5%?
My buyer is not a first time buyer. She is an elderly lady whose daughter is handling the sale for her. They are mortgage free and will be cash once they have sold their house. Their buyer is a buy to let who is buying with a mortgage. I don't know why my buyer is only offering a 5% deposit. I could understand more if they were a first time buyer and were struggling to get the deposit together but they are not.
I am mortgage free and will be a cash buyer dependent on the sale of my house and the people I am buying off are no onward chain.
Could this cause any problems if, god forbid, someone had to pull out after exchange happened? Awful things can happen, such as people become seriously ill or suffer a bereavement. What if my buyers suffered some dreadful event and had to pull out after exchange? I assume they would then owe me 5% of my sale price. However, would I then have to pull out of my house purchase and pay the people I am buying a house off 10%? This doesn't seem fair. What should I do? Should I ask them to up their deposit to 10%? Should I ask if I can change my deposit to 5%?
My buyer is not a first time buyer. She is an elderly lady whose daughter is handling the sale for her. They are mortgage free and will be cash once they have sold their house. Their buyer is a buy to let who is buying with a mortgage. I don't know why my buyer is only offering a 5% deposit. I could understand more if they were a first time buyer and were struggling to get the deposit together but they are not.
I am mortgage free and will be a cash buyer dependent on the sale of my house and the people I am buying off are no onward chain.
0
Comments
-
Yes, it's very normal. The deposit % often gets smaller as it simply gets passed up the chain.
If your buyers pull out after exchange, they will be responsible for your losses.1 -
Oh thank you. I wonder why my solicitor is querying it then?0
-
Even if a death occurs, completion should still go ahead, as the estate of the buyer would remain liable to conclude the contract. Obviously though, a delay would result.No free lunch, and no free laptop1
-
Shookup said:I am going through the process of selling my house and buying a new one. My buyer wants to give a 5% deposit on exchange. I have offered a 10% deposit on exchange to the people whose property I am buying under the advice of my solicitor and the belief that this is the norm. - the contractual deposit will likely still be 10% on both sides, just your buyer is asking to pay 5% cash upfront and 5% at completion. If they fail to complete after exchange, you'd still be due the full 10% (or your damages if they exceed the 10%)
Could this cause any problems if, god forbid, someone had to pull out after exchange happened? - well the difference is you'd have to recover the remaining 5% from the buyer rather than the solicitor. However since they own a property, you have a high chance of getting this (eventually)
Awful things can happen, such as people become seriously ill or suffer a bereavement. What if my buyers suffered some dreadful event and had to pull out after exchange? - those don't necessarily stop completion. It might cause delays, but the costs of failing to complete are high so it would be in the interest of your buyer (/buyer's estate / buyer's representative) to fulfil the contract.
I assume they would then owe me 5% of my sale price. - no, 10% However, would I then have to pull out of my house purchase and pay the people I am buying a house off 10%? This doesn't seem fair. What should I do? Should I ask them to up their deposit to 10%? Should I ask if I can change my deposit to 5%?
My buyer is not a first time buyer. She is an elderly lady whose daughter is handling the sale for her. They are mortgage free and will be cash once they have sold their house. Their buyer is a buy to let who is buying with a mortgage. I don't know why my buyer is only offering a 5% deposit. I could understand more if they were a first time buyer and were struggling to get the deposit together but they are not. - they are likely getting 5% up the chain from their buyer (as the houses down the chain are usually in decreasing value). The lady likely doesn't have cash to supplement their buyer's deposit, as her funds are tied up in the house -> perfectly normal.
I am mortgage free and will be a cash buyer dependent on the sale of my house and the people I am buying off are no onward chain.
The reason is likely because your buyer is getting a smaller deposit up the chain from their buyer etc.. so they may not have the cash on hand to top it up. However since they have a property, you do have a high chance of recovering it (eventually).0 -
The % exchange deposit passed across doesn't affect liability. It's taken just so there's something in the bank immediately should the worst occur. It doesn't affect their legal liability.5% is suspiciously exact though. Normally (these days) it's the deposit passed on from the buyer below. So it's strange that works out as exactly 5%. So that would actually worry me why they are doing that. Just to make it a round number?
I can't recall what it was on my recent sale / purchase but I do know it was passed up from my buyers buyer and that then went on up to my vendor. And certainly wasn't 10% , most likely much closer to 5% and I wasn't asked to make up the difference nor did I volunteer to pay 10%. If you are worried ask your solicitor if you can just pass whatever you get upwards.1 -
FTB on the 95% mortgage scheme, so entire equity "deposit" going into the exchange "deposit"?0
-
AdrianC said:FTB on the 95% mortgage scheme, so entire equity "deposit" going into the exchange "deposit"?Nope;BTL investor > "little old lady" buyer > OP0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.2K Spending & Discounts
- 243.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 597.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.6K Life & Family
- 256.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards