Windscreen Ticket on Private Road (Appeal to Parking & Property Rejected)

PeanutDad

Hi Forum Members, I hope all are well given these challenging times!
The driver got a windscreen ticket on a private road at night time. The reason for the parking ticket was 'vehicle was parked on private property in a manner where the driver agreed to pay a parking charge as displayed by signage". They appealed to Parking & Property Management but the appeal was (unsurprisingly rejected). Response is attached. I understand that appealing to IAS is perhaps futile. Please advise on next steps. Much appreciated.

As you can see from attached photos, the signage is not lit and thus not visible at night. There is no way someone can read them.  

Redx

You answered your own question , it's either appeal to the IAS , or court within 6 years if you fail to appeal it lose the the appeal and fail to pay

Read the newbies FAQ sticky thread near the top of the forum first

Plan A is the best option , not appeal plans B & C ( you did B )

D_P_Dance

It also contains far too much tiny print, read this and complain to your MP.,

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5972164/parking-eye-signs-oxford-road-reading/p1

PeanutDad

@redx and @d_p_dance - thank you for your responses.
I was not the driver and had advised that they follow plan A but for some strange reason they went ahead and appealed! OK will appeal to IAS. Thanks

PeanutDad

Appeal to IAS done on the basis of unlit and non legible signage.

KeithP

It is still not too late for you to follow plan A.

Coupon-mad

PeanutDad said:

Appeal to IAS done on the basis of unlit and non legible signage.

That's good as long as you uploaded the evidence.  Be prepared to keep replying and keep adding new comments about PPM's evidence, not just letting it go to what the IAS call 'adjudication' too quickly.

PeanutDad

Coupon-mad said:

PeanutDad said:

Appeal to IAS done on the basis of unlit and non legible signage.

That's good as long as you uploaded the evidence.  Be prepared to keep replying and keep adding new comments about PPM's evidence, not just lettering it go to what the IAS call 'adjudication' too quickly.

Thanks. Yes, I did upload the photos. Will do so as suggested. 
PS. Would love you thoughts on my other thread about Warwick Uni :-)

PeanutDad

KeithP said:

It is still not too late for you to follow plan A.

Would you be kind enough to elaborate please?

KeithP

PeanutDad said:

KeithP said:

It is still not too late for you to follow plan A.

Would you be kind enough to elaborate please?

You mentioned 'plan A' before I did, so I assumed you were au fait with it...

PeanutDad said:

I was not the driver and had advised that they follow plan A but for some strange reason they went ahead and appealed!

...and I responded to that post.

But of course I am happy to elaborate.
The first post of the NEWBIES thread includes...

D_P_Dance

I agree, eignage seems uunfit for purpose, read this,

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6242993/court-report-brentford-telephone-ukpc-roasted#latest

Judges often throw out cases due to unsatisfactory signage.  Have you complained to your MP?