We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Business Data Protection claims

Snowman1950
Posts: 9 Forumite

I frequently get asked 'personal information' by businesses that may well be ones that I deal with. For example I recently received a phone call following an inspection of a gas fitting that needed minor attention. They claimed to want to set a date for the repair to be performed. I agreed, but was then asked for information such as my address, which they clearly have since they would have the inspection report, but was informed that this is required by law for 'Data Protection' purposes. I see no way that such information should be required but cannot find any indication on the internet (everything I find refers to how an organisation uses one's data) as to whether giving such information IS a legal requirement. It seems to me that if organisations are required to obtain this information, it opens the door for scammers to obtain personal information. Does anyone know what the law requires?
0
Comments
-
They can ask for pretty much any information that they think they need, so long as they can justify asking for it. Once they have any information, they are required to check that it is up-to-date. It seems perfectly reasonable to me to check that the address they have for you is correct.
If it sticks, force it.
If it breaks, well it wasn't working right anyway.1 -
What concerns did you have about providing your address? Surely not a security issue.0
-
Maybe they just wanted to verify they were talking to the right person? Makes sure they hadn't misdialled a number, or a report was filled out correctly, or you hadn't moved house etc.
Name and address are about as low grade information as you can get - even my postman and the Hermes man know these.I don't care about your first world problems; I have enough of my own!1 -
These responses aren't really what I was asking. The point is that I'm being told it is a LEGAL requirement of Data Protection legislation to ask these questions. My query is does anyone know if they ARE legally required to do so since I can't find anything on the internet that states that they do.0
-
So they already have your address but you aren't happy they are verifying that they are speaking to the correct person and therefore protecting your information?0
-
Snowman1950 said:These responses aren't really what I was asking. The point is that I'm being told it is a LEGAL requirement of Data Protection legislation to ask these questions. My query is does anyone know if they ARE legally required to do so since I can't find anything on the internet that states that they do.
So the answer is yes.1 -
OK, so how does this fit with regular advice from the Police and Banks that we should not give out any personal details over the phone? I accept that if I make a call so that I know exactly who I'm talking to, then asking for this information is valid, but if I'm called then it goes against all the advice even this site gives out.0
-
It fits with it as police advice is always aimed at those most vulnerable. E.g. Don't hand over your life savings to the nice man who knocked on your door and offered to tarmac your drive.
For those with the discriminatory skills to assess low and high leve lrisks, it's excessive advice.
If you're not sure you have the skills, then hang up and call the company back yourself. They won't be offended.0 -
Actually I worked for many years with IT security, including dealing with IT auditors so I do know my way around security and when you talk about low and high level risks, I (and the auditors) would seek zero risk, not 'low' risk wherever possible. And I'm not talking about the 'tarmac your drive' merchants, I'm referring to what the Banks especially advise us to beware of, i.e. identity theft. I therefore do not consider it to be 'excessive advice', especially since If identity theft were to occur, I would expect to be asked whether I'd taken all precautions to prevent it.
With regard to 'calling back', this often involves a lot of hassle. Firstly I'm not going to call back on the number that the caller offers to give me, so I have to find the number from elsewhere. Then I call the organisation but it's the wrong building and they've never heard of the person and so it goes on. If it's my bank, or someone I know, then fine, but not when it's an organisation that I don't normally deal with.0 -
If you're not willing to call back, that's the choice you have to make in your risk assessment and how you proceed.
Establish the risk level you're willing to accept (which is rarely zero) and put your mitigation plan into action.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards