We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Speedybase
bozzy18
Posts: 121 Forumite
Hello folks - what are your thoughts on 'speedybase' foundation? To me it appears to be quick, much more cost efficient, a good way to get around the party wall agreement etc but I am not a builder nor do I know anything about building stuff. They offer a 25 years guarantee for the speedybase foundation. We are looking to extend 4 metres outwards from our detached house (less than 3 metres away from neighbour's house hence why party wall agreement) and 4.2 metres wide. What are your thoughts on this please?
Thanks.
Boz
Thanks.
Boz
:beer:
0
Comments
-
Is this for an extension or a conservatory?0
-
For a conservatory or other temporary structure (e.g. shed or garden room), adequate with caveats & reservations. For a proper extension, really not acceptable, and I doubt very much that Building Control would sign off on it.
Any language construct that forces such insanity in this case should be abandoned without regrets. –
Erik Aronesty, 2014
Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.1 -
Thanks - can I ask why it is not acceptable? It will be all done with building regs and designed to BSI standard etc. They would dig down 1 metre and infill with concrete pads then lay a steel frame on top.FreeBear said:For a conservatory or other temporary structure (e.g. shed or garden room), adequate with caveats & reservations. For a proper extension, really not acceptable, and I doubt very much that Building Control would sign off on it.
:beer:0 -
Are the company based in Worthing doing the complete build?0
-
How do they compare cost wise with a traditional brick/cavity/block built extension?0
-
So... Shallow piles - A little more than some of the speedybases I'd seen being put down for conservatories. Depending on the size of the pads & steel frames, you may get an acceptable build, but the devil is in the preparation and detail. I'd have concerns about the long term viability of the steelwork and how easy it would be to monitor corrosion and do any necessary repairs.bozzy18 said:
Thanks - can I ask why it is not acceptable? It will be all done with building regs and designed to BSI standard etc. They would dig down 1 metre and infill with concrete pads then lay a steel frame on top.FreeBear said:For a conservatory or other temporary structure (e.g. shed or garden room), adequate with caveats & reservations. For a proper extension, really not acceptable, and I doubt very much that Building Control would sign off on it.
Any language construct that forces such insanity in this case should be abandoned without regrets. –
Erik Aronesty, 2014
Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.1 -
FreeBear said:
So... Shallow piles - A little more than some of the speedybases I'd seen being put down for conservatories. Depending on the size of the pads & steel frames, you may get an acceptable build, but the devil is in the preparation and detail. I'd have concerns about the long term viability of the steelwork and how easy it would be to monitor corrosion and do any necessary repairs.bozzy18 said:
Thanks - can I ask why it is not acceptable? It will be all done with building regs and designed to BSI standard etc. They would dig down 1 metre and infill with concrete pads then lay a steel frame on top.FreeBear said:For a conservatory or other temporary structure (e.g. shed or garden room), adequate with caveats & reservations. For a proper extension, really not acceptable, and I doubt very much that Building Control would sign off on it.
Thanks for this - very helpful. They said they would dig down 1 metre deep but holes instead of trenches. With regard to the steelwork - how are other steelwork is monitored such as RSJs, steel frame build etc - aren't they not easily monitored either? Nevertheless i will ask them how the steelframe is monitored and see what they say.FreeBear said:
So... Shallow piles - A little more than some of the speedybases I'd seen being put down for conservatories. Depending on the size of the pads & steel frames, you may get an acceptable build, but the devil is in the preparation and detail. I'd have concerns about the long term viability of the steelwork and how easy it would be to monitor corrosion and do any necessary repairs.bozzy18 said:
Thanks - can I ask why it is not acceptable? It will be all done with building regs and designed to BSI standard etc. They would dig down 1 metre and infill with concrete pads then lay a steel frame on top.FreeBear said:For a conservatory or other temporary structure (e.g. shed or garden room), adequate with caveats & reservations. For a proper extension, really not acceptable, and I doubt very much that Building Control would sign off on it.:beer:0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
