We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Portfolio construction

ChilliBob
Posts: 2,389 Forumite

Hey everyone,
I've just skim read the recent thread about Japan and China and noticed some comments about new investors perhaps not knowing about portfolio construction.
I'm a new investor, and to an extent, this perhaps (almost certainly!) is something I could benefit from knowing more sbout.
Content online either seems to focus on 'Just go passive Global Equities and choose bonds' 'Active thar be dragons'. Or 'Choose this active fund for this reason ' Trustnet type articles.
There doesn't seem to be much content on the popular sites, or I have not found it, on the actual mechanics of portfolio construction and maintenance/rebalancing.
I'm aware of the need to diversify, but I'd be interested to read articles others think are decent, or learn how more experienced investors on here would construct and maintain a portfolio. Especially in the current climate where the concept of 60:40 is claimed to be dead by many a manager, and the role of gov bonds not behaving as they have been for ages.
Yeah, that's sbout it!
For what's its worth I intend to use a combination of passive and active funds.
I've just skim read the recent thread about Japan and China and noticed some comments about new investors perhaps not knowing about portfolio construction.
I'm a new investor, and to an extent, this perhaps (almost certainly!) is something I could benefit from knowing more sbout.
Content online either seems to focus on 'Just go passive Global Equities and choose bonds' 'Active thar be dragons'. Or 'Choose this active fund for this reason ' Trustnet type articles.
There doesn't seem to be much content on the popular sites, or I have not found it, on the actual mechanics of portfolio construction and maintenance/rebalancing.
I'm aware of the need to diversify, but I'd be interested to read articles others think are decent, or learn how more experienced investors on here would construct and maintain a portfolio. Especially in the current climate where the concept of 60:40 is claimed to be dead by many a manager, and the role of gov bonds not behaving as they have been for ages.
Yeah, that's sbout it!
For what's its worth I intend to use a combination of passive and active funds.
0
Comments
-
0
-
Here's something from a Boglehead perspective.
https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Investing_from_the_UK
You can make investing as easy or as hard and complex as you want. You need to decide if you lose anything by keeping it simple or gain anything by complicating things, or vis a versa. Bear in mind everyone has their own biases, mine is for simplicity and passive indexes, but I also have one active income fund. So stay flexible, don't be too dogmatic, and don't do anything you don't understand.“So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”1 -
Prism said:0
-
bostonerimus said:Here's something from a Boglehead perspective.
https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Investing_from_the_UK
You can make investing as easy or as hard and complex as you want. You need to decide if you lose anything by keeping it simple or gain anything by complicating things, or vis a versa. Bear in mind everyone has their own biases, mine is for simplicity and passive indexes, but I also have one active income fund. So stay flexible, don't be too dogmatic, and don't do anything you don't understand.
As regards easy of complex, I'll lie somewhere in the middle, closer to simple I hope0 -
ChilliBob said:Prism said:0
-
Also I'd be interested to hear what people think of construction in the current climate, where investors chronicle proclaimed the role of government bonds was very different to the past.
A crib sheet of correlations would be good, alongside one's that typically do well or bad in inflationary and higher interest rate environments.
Clearly diversified equities which are all say 'growth orientsted' is still very narrow, in the current climate what are good combinations (besides say value focused funds).
E. G. Real Estate, gold, commodities, infrastructure, corporate bonds etc. Or should one just look to wealth preservation type things like cgt/pnl/ruffer? I'd considered these kind of things, and also considered stuff like REITs, TRIG etc.0 -
Prism said:ChilliBob said:Prism said:0
-
By definition, you can't have a negative correlation betweeen two assets and have both make a positive returns at the same time.
0 -
Indeed, but that's not what I'm thinking about. Bonds cushioned the blow for those invested when the pandemic hit. That's what I'm talking about, and the claim is that its only gov bonds which have this correlation, but now they basically have negative yields in most cases.
It does make me think perhaps I should leave it to an active manager in a WP fund instead, at the expense of higher returns in a global tracker or other active funds.0 -
Op, hopefully this isn't against forum rules and just for transparency I have no affiliation but there is a YouTube channel called Pensioncraft or similar.
The guy sounds like he knows his stuff, very in depth analysis which sometimes goes over my head but I like the way he articulates investment concepts and am fairly sure he has covered portfolio allocations. I haven't had time to watch a lot of the videos but so far liking the content.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards