We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Investment Houses

Options
I currently have a 6 figure sum with HL both ISA's and Pension.  For safety I need to move the ISA's to another platform.  What is the next largest fund house in the UK? 
«1

Comments

  • AlanP_2
    AlanP_2 Posts: 3,515 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If by fund house you mean platform, as that is what  HL is, then I would suggest either Fidelity or Vanguard both of which dwarf HL on company size.

    Waht are you seeking safety from by the way?
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 27,651 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 29 April 2021 at 9:21AM
    I currently have a 6 figure sum with HL both ISA's and Pension.  For safety I need to move the ISA's to another platform.  What is the next largest fund house in the UK? 
    We get this sort of question very often.e.g.https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6262935/better-to-use-more-than-one-investment-platform#latest
    In reality the chance of a mainstream investment platform like HL going bust is extremely unlikely ( they are very profitable) and in any case you still own the investments if anything went wrong, not the platform .
    Many posters on here are holding hundreds of thousands with one platform and sleeping OK .
    More sensibly if you have a six figure sum is looking at an alternative to HL with lower charges .
    https://monevator.com/compare-uk-cheapest-online-brokers/
  • AlanP_2 said:
    If by fund house you mean platform, as that is what  HL is, then I would suggest either Fidelity or Vanguard both of which dwarf HL on company size.

    Waht are you seeking safety from by the way?
    I don't like the whole 6 figure sum being in one location.  Nice for teh management of funds, but does cause me a little concern.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,570 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    HL is about third or fourth in terms of the size of platforms.  It is very profitable and moving funds away from HL into a less profitable or non-profitable platform or a platform with high illiquid assets would be increasing your risks. Not reducing them.

    Having assets on platforms is not the same as having money at the bank.


    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • nxdmsandkaskdjaqd
    nxdmsandkaskdjaqd Posts: 871 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 29 April 2021 at 11:18AM
    dunstonh said:
    HL is about third or fourth in terms of the size of platforms.  It is very profitable and moving funds away from HL into a less profitable or non-profitable platform or a platform with high illiquid assets would be increasing your risks. Not reducing them.
    Who would be the 1st, 2nd and 3rd?

    I didn't understand your comment about risk increasing, could you expand on this?

    I do understand your point about savings in banks.

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,570 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Who would be the 1st, 2nd and 3rd?

    They are intermediary platforms.    i.e. you would need an IFA or and FA attached to that platform.   So, they wont be available to you as a DIY investor.   The biggest actually has some of the worst software. So, despite being the largest and probably the most secure financially. you really wouldn't want to use it if you are relatively active in transactions.  Invest and forget maybe ok but not if you want a clean front end. 

      Most of the platforms in the top 10 are intermediary only.   I think you would be looking at only HL and Fidelity making it into the top 10 who offer services to DIY investors.   Although I haven't seen an updated list for a long time and there has been some consolidations in the platforms in that period that would alter positions.  A J Bell may be in there now as an option open to DIY investors.

    I didn't understand your comment about risk increasing, could you expand on this?

    If you are already with one of the safest investment platforms out there, then any money shifted to a lesser platform (in terms of financial strength) increases your risk.   It doesn't reduce it.  

    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • dunstonh said:
    Who would be the 1st, 2nd and 3rd?

    They are intermediary platforms.    i.e. you would need an IFA or and FA attached to that platform.   So, they wont be available to you as a DIY investor.   The biggest actually has some of the worst software. So, despite being the largest and probably the most secure financially. you really wouldn't want to use it if you are relatively active in transactions.  Invest and forget maybe ok but not if you want a clean front end. 

      Most of the platforms in the top 10 are intermediary only.   I think you would be looking at only HL and Fidelity making it into the top 10 who offer services to DIY investors.   Although I haven't seen an updated list for a long time and there has been some consolidations in the platforms in that period that would alter positions.  A J Bell may be in there now as an option open to DIY investors.

    I didn't understand your comment about risk increasing, could you expand on this?

    If you are already with one of the safest investment platforms out there, then any money shifted to a lesser platform (in terms of financial strength) increases your risk.   It doesn't reduce it.  

    I now understand your point about risk now.  That' a very interesting point.

    I would like to see a list of all of the fund houses/intermediary's and who's SW they use.  Anyone?
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 27,651 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    I would like to see a list of all of the fund houses/intermediary's and who's SW they use.  Anyone?

    This is an investment forum not an IT one !

    When looking at a platform we would normally look at the charges , the investments available , whether they were a mainstream operator , if we liked the website and their reputation . The software they use would be a mystery and not of interest for the majority of investors .

    Dunstonh is a professional so is more aware of these things.

  • I would like to see a list of all of the fund houses/intermediary's and who's SW they use.  Anyone?

    This is an investment forum not an IT one !

    When looking at a platform we would normally look at the charges , the investments available , whether they were a mainstream operator , if we liked the website and their reputation . The software they use would be a mystery and not of interest for the majority of investors .

    Dunstonh is a professional so is more aware of these things.

    Dunstonh raised the point about the largest having the worst SW, so it seems a valid question to see who else is in that category.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,570 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Or Vanguard Investor, which I think isn't a huge platform in the UK, but Vanguard are one of the 2 biggest fund management groups globally.

    The Vanguard platform is restricted and only allows own brand funds.  That is a negative in terms of investment selection but a positive in terms of financial security as it means they wont have any obscure illiquid investments that would take an administrator years to shut down (time = cost).   But then again, if Vanguard fails (which is inconceivable given their business), it means you wouldn't just be re-registering your funds to a new platform but also having to wait for the funds to be liquidated and some of the funds could have liquidity issues.  So, there can be negatives to having your platform and fund house all as one.

    However, you can also massively overthink these things and create scenarios that are unlikely likely to occur with armageddon. 

    We know that with platform failures, the FSCS uses the £85k per person to pay for the administrator.  A platform with a majority of liquid tradeable assets (UT/OEICs) can be moved on quickly by an administrator.  Although the most likely scenario is a buyer as they would get the AUM cheap.  However, in reality, a platform would have sought a buyer long before that point.  It's only really a problem if they hold illiquid assets to a level that scares off buyers.


    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 256.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.