We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Raising money against assets / selling assets whilst in the period of administration
Jet
Posts: 1,652 Forumite
Probate has been granted and we are in the period of administration.
I am residual beneficiary (and sole executor) and have land and property to come to me which needs to be transferred. Can I sell assets / dispose of them / raise finance against them whilst in the period of administration as executor / residual beneficiary?
I am residual beneficiary (and sole executor) and have land and property to come to me which needs to be transferred. Can I sell assets / dispose of them / raise finance against them whilst in the period of administration as executor / residual beneficiary?
0
Comments
-
If you have probate and are the executor and the assets are no specifically left to an individual then you can sell them.1
-
Are you planning to keep the land and property? If not you don’t need to transfer the property to your name before selling.1
-
And can I use the funds myself? Or should I leave the funds in an executor account until the estate is settled?Flugelhorn said:If you have probate and are the executor and the assets are no specifically left to an individual then you can sell them.
With regards to property, I presume I can't raise finance against them until they are legally in my name?0 -
Strictly it should all stay in the executor's account until you are sure that all is settled ie that you have given notice in the gazette for any creditors etc
I sold a property and the money went straight to the exec's account. The difference was that I was the exec and sole beneficiary so if there were any unknown debts it was down to me to pay them anyway, risk is you use the money and then need it to pay debts.0 -
I'm residual beneficiary, so like you, any unknown debts would be down to me anyway. So selling is an option.Flugelhorn said:Strictly it should all stay in the executor's account until you are sure that all is settled ie that you have given notice in the gazette for any creditors etc
I sold a property and the money went straight to the exec's account. The difference was that I was the exec and sole beneficiary so if there were any unknown debts it was down to me to pay them anyway, risk is you use the money and then need it to pay debts.
Am I right in thinking, I couldn't raise finance (ie, take out a mortgage on a house) until it has been legally transferred to me?0 -
You don't have to advertise in the Gazette. Most people don't bother, particularly if they are the main/residual beneficiary as well as executor, because they simply pay up out of the funds they've inherited. It just builds in another period of delay if the estate is straightforward.Flugelhorn said:Strictly it should all stay in the executor's account until you are sure that all is settled ie that you have given notice in the gazette for any creditors etcGoogling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!2 -
Jet said:
I'm residual beneficiary, so like you, any unknown debts would be down to me anyway. So selling is an option.Flugelhorn said:Strictly it should all stay in the executor's account until you are sure that all is settled ie that you have given notice in the gazette for any creditors etc
I sold a property and the money went straight to the exec's account. The difference was that I was the exec and sole beneficiary so if there were any unknown debts it was down to me to pay them anyway, risk is you use the money and then need it to pay debts.
Am I right in thinking, I couldn't raise finance (ie, take out a mortgage on a house) until it has been legally transferred to me?
They can be done at the same time, like most people do with a purchase.
The issue with transfer first is some lender have a period before they will lend on property that has been acquired recently.
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 262K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
