We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Property ‘undervalued’ by 15k... is it fair to ask to meet in the middle?
Comments
-
The house we were going to buy was downvalued by 40K. We didn't have that extra cash to put in to buy it nor did we feel that was a good plan. We tried to negotiate with vendors as we were tied in to our lender so had to pay a fee & wanted that fee off the house so if they allowed it then we could try another lender. They refused so we pulled out. They sold again in days. Intrigued to see if it sells for original price
0 -
Surely now "the stamp duty madness" no longer applies. Anyone offering now or in the early stages of conveyancing are highly unlikely to meet the June deadline.0
-
Madness by it's very definition is not rational.thriftytracey said:Surely now "the stamp duty madness" no longer applies. Anyone offering now or in the early stages of conveyancing are highly unlikely to meet the June deadline.0 -
Thanks for all the advice.
it’s been valued 10k below asking price so again not much from both our and the sellers point of view.We are reluctant to make up the full amount because is our eyes we can put that money towards a more expensive property, if that’s also valued at asking price.We have a FTB buying our property so a minimal chain whereas other people would have 2/3 in the chain for the price of property we are going for.
We will wait to see what the appeal comes back with and go from there.0 -
jodiepoke said:Thanks for all the advice.
it’s been valued 10k below asking price so again not much from both our and the sellers point of view.We are reluctant to make up the full amount because is our eyes we can put that money towards a more expensive property, if that’s also valued at asking price.We have a FTB buying our property so a minimal chain whereas other people would have 2/3 in the chain for the price of property we are going for.
We will wait to see what the appeal comes back with and go from there.Don't forget that bank valuations are figures that can be expected in a fire sale if you default on the loan. The chances of the amount being revised under appeal is negligible. The agent is wasting your time even thinking this process will work.When you buy a house, part of your due diligence is gathering information about what the house is worth to you, including input from neutral bodies like the bank valuers. Until now the price has been a finger in the air between the agent and vendor, you chose to offer on that basis. How does it stand with comparables?To think it's been incorrectly priced like a tin of beans on a supermarket shelf is not how the housing market works. It's purely supply and demand and a few weeks ago you were happy to offer that price, now you're not. If I was the vendor, I'd remarket to other buyers particularly now you chose to set a benchmark.I've just withdrawn an offer on a place after a second viewing. My offer had not been accepted even though I'd done my homework and felt the place was overpriced (it's been on the market since late last year in a very buoyant part of the country). The vendor and agent had hoped the second viewing would cause me to up my offer, it had the opposite effect, I saw stuff I hadn't noticed on the first viewing and I withdrew my offer altogether as I know what that house is worth to me and the asking price it wasn't.This forum is full of threads titled "undervalued" when really they should say "overbid". The agent works for the vendor and is employed to maximise the sale price of the property on their books.
Signature on holiday for two weeks5 -
But this might be a temporary spike in prices, which amounts to the same as paying over the odds. Hard to tell.davidmcn said:If it's a rising market then the prices are going to be higher than the valuations (which are largely based on prices agreed at least months ago), so you're not necessarily paying "over the odds".No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
The quickest and easiest way is to tell the seller through your solicitor that it was valued lower. If they put it back on the market the same may happen again to them. If they have a list of possible buyers and someone is a cash buyer they will be able to pay what they want for the property.
Just do it now and find out, the appeal by the estate agent is useless, don't waste your time.3 -
Yes agreed, but going over the asking price when most people view houses that are at their limit with a small deposit doesn't bode well. It's all about risk with the buyer, rather than value of the house. I've just put 45% down on a house which isn't stretching us (as the property is smaller than most would find acceptable, not because we're loaded) and the "valuation" was done in minutes. People who have a small deposit should look more cheaply, and sellers shouldn't be greedy.[Deleted User] said:
In the name of caution, I assume there is only so much the estate agent can do to identify that someone who has outbid others is going to flake.lookstraightahead said:
Or be more cautious and sensible next time about expectations.[Deleted User] said:
Not intending to put down anyone down. Just a straightforward observation that if you outbid everyone, then the vendor will in my view have less inclination to re-open negotiations.Getting_greyer said:
Yes those are mostly fair comments. This is all relevant on the actual offer agreed and amount % of ltv, but for me, if I had made an offer and the bank came back with a substantially lower valuation, I would have a serious think about whether to keep to my original offer regardless of whether I had the extra cash in place or not. So congratulations on your last sentence which I'm sure you thought was a sweet burn, but not really relevant.[Deleted User] said:
The valuation of a lender is not the absolute value of a property. A different lender may value it more or less. The parents recently had lenders who came in 10% apart. Another buyer could be in cash, not relying on lending at all. I think its rather wishful thinking to reduce the offer because you couldn't arrange the finance.Getting_greyer said:It's not like you're amending your offer because of some trifling matter about the colour of the bathroom. Wouldn't other valuations come back as roughly the same? Remember they'd have to start again from scratch with a new buyer if not paying cash. I'd offer the valuation first before deciding wether it's worth topping up....unless you already know it is worth it.0 -
Sure. We don't know what the range of other offers was. But if everybody else was also offering "over the odds" then it suggests that currently the market is confident enough of it not being merely a temporary blip. Just pointing out that valuations are based on completions from at least a few months ago, which may mean prices agreed a year ago.GDB2222 said:
But this might be a temporary spike in prices, which amounts to the same as paying over the odds. Hard to tell.davidmcn said:If it's a rising market then the prices are going to be higher than the valuations (which are largely based on prices agreed at least months ago), so you're not necessarily paying "over the odds".1 -
48k, excellent!livetoclimb said:
We had a 48k ‘down valuation’ earlier this year. We were able to negotiate the price down significantly. Whilst I appreciate we were lucky (and it was likely somewhat overvalued against the local market, but it’s unique and we love it) the worst anyone can say is no.[Deleted User] said:
The valuation of a lender is not the absolute value of a property. A different lender may value it more or less. The parents recently had lenders who came in 10% apart. Another buyer could be in cash, not relying on lending at all. I think its rather wishful thinking to reduce the offer because you couldn't arrange the finance.Getting_greyer said:It's not like you're amending your offer because of some trifling matter about the colour of the bathroom. Wouldn't other valuations come back as roughly the same? Remember they'd have to start again from scratch with a new buyer if not paying cash. I'd offer the valuation first before deciding wether it's worth topping up....unless you already know it is worth it.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


