We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Travel refund - with a difference

Options
HughesieII
HughesieII Posts: 2 Newbie
First Post
edited 19 May at 4:56PM in Coronavirus Board
I was due to travel to a wedding in Cancun in April 2021 which was booked in November 2020.

At the time of booking it was classed as "essential travel only" by the Gov, which covered being able to attend a wedding internationally, this changed on the 29th of March where essential travel to a wedding, for this reason, was excluded.

Pre 29th March advice:
Legally permitted reasons for international travel include:
•work
•volunteering
•education
•medical, or compassionate grounds
•weddings, funerals and related events

Post 29th March advice:
Reasonable excuses for international travel include:
•work
•volunteering
•education
•medical, or compassionate grounds
•funerals
•leaving the UK if you do not live in the UK, and have only been here temporarily
•allowing access to parents with children who do not live in the same country

As the guidance changed so close to the wedding I was unable to secure a refund on my accommodation costs of Circa £2k.

My travel insurance has rejected the claim based on the following:
I appreciate these guidelines weren’t in place when you booked your trip, but there was advice against all
but essential travel in place at that time. Therefore, irrespective of the more recent specific guidelines
around travelling for a wedding, there’s no cover under the policy for your claim circumstances because the
FCDO advice was in place when you booked your trip. I appreciate this isn’t the outcome you were hoping
for, but I hope I’ve explained why we’ve taken this view.

Are they correct in rejecting the claim?

Regards
Hughesie 

Comments

  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 37,149 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Which company was it and what do the policy terms say?

    I can see their argument to be honest, i.e. that they won't pay out if non-essential travel is banned (generically) by the FCDO, even if your specific reason for travelling offers an exemption from that, but much will depend on exactly how the relevant clauses are worded.
  • bagand96
    bagand96 Posts: 6,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I'm not sure if this makes a difference legally... But was it a wedding for someone who lives in Mexico, or was it a wedding for UK based people who'd chosen to have a wedding abroad?
  • It was with Natwest and for a wedding of my American best pal.
  • sheramber
    sheramber Posts: 22,518 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts I've been Money Tipped! Name Dropper
      If you are not happy with their reply follow the complaint procedure which should be detailed in your policy document.
  • onashoestring
    onashoestring Posts: 1,631 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I thought that the previous advice that international travel for weddings was permitted only for those actually getting married - not their guests? 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.