We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Advice on first S & S ISA opened with Vanguard

Options
I've opened my first S&S ISA with vanguard at the end of the last tax year and have a few questions. I invested the full allowance into the following funds roughly as follows:

70% - life strategy 100%
15% - FTSE all world high dividen yield
15% - S&P 500

I didn't have any specifically strong reasons for this split, it was just how I decided to go after reading other threads and information online. Any advice or feedback on this allocation would be great thanks.

I'm looking to invest this years allowance in as well now and wondered if people would recommend going all in or is it better to contribute over the year to ride out any fluctuations in the price?

Comments

  • george4064
    george4064 Posts: 2,927 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    As many others will say, best practice is to invest as much as you can afford to as soon as you can. 

    This means that overall you have more money invested earlier and statistically over the long-term you will get better performance if you invest a cash lump sum in one go rather than drip feeding it over a 12 month period.
    "If you aren’t willing to own a stock for ten years, don’t even think about owning it for ten minutes” Warren Buffett

    Save £12k in 2025 - #024 £1,450 / £15,000 (9%)
  • Alexland
    Alexland Posts: 10,183 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 9 April 2021 at 9:16PM
    I wouldn't touch a passive high yield fund with a barge pole and don't see why you need the S&P500 fund when you already have heavy US exposure in the VLS100 fund. I would just go VLS100 or perhaps Vanguard Global All Cap if you don't want the UK bias but it's looking good value at the moment. @coastline posted a good graph earlier on another thread which addresses US stock outperformance periods so be careful if only looking at data from the last 5-10 years.

  • isayhello
    isayhello Posts: 455 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    So @george4064 the idea of investing it all in one go is better even if prices dropped later on and if you drip fed then you would buy cheaper? I know there might be different views on this, was just curious while trying to decide which approach to take.
  • isayhello
    isayhello Posts: 455 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    @Alexland Can I ask the reason for avoiding the high yield fund? I'd seen on many other posts and videos people were investing in this one.
  • Alexland
    Alexland Posts: 10,183 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    isayhello said:
    @Alexland Can I ask the reason for avoiding the high yield fund? I'd seen on many other posts and videos people were investing in this one.
    Companies with high dividend yield tend to have low share prices because the market has less faith in their future prospects. Going passive into high yield risks buying into all the dividend traps and while the diversification will help smooth the return such funds tend to have a noticable performance lag. If investing for dividends it's best not to be too greedy on yield and remember that the quality and growth prospects are also important.
  • JohnWinder
    JohnWinder Posts: 1,862 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I'm not sure that high dividend, widely diversified equity funds are a hanging crime unless you believe they're immune to downturns in a downturn and thus pin your faith on them for retirement. However their returns might turn out to be, they seem to offer nothing that a probably cheaper all cap fund would.
  • george4064
    george4064 Posts: 2,927 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    isayhello said:
    So @george4064 the idea of investing it all in one go is better even if prices dropped later on and if you drip fed then you would buy cheaper? I know there might be different views on this, was just curious while trying to decide which approach to take.
    That’s only visible in hindsight though, so not much use when deciding to invest or not. Some people decide to drip feed rather than invest lump sum for psychological reasons, which is fine but statistically speaking this approach will most likely result in lower returns than if the cash was invested as soon as possible as a lump sum.

    Statistically speaking markets go up, and that when you ‘increase’ the length of time in the market it improves your chances of receiving positive returns on your portfolio. This is assuming you are invested in a properly diversified portfolio, i.e. not Bitcoin or something!

    "If you aren’t willing to own a stock for ten years, don’t even think about owning it for ten minutes” Warren Buffett

    Save £12k in 2025 - #024 £1,450 / £15,000 (9%)
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.