We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Does this split makes good investment

snowshine
snowshine Posts: 148 Forumite
Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
edited 8 April 2021 at 8:32PM in Savings & investments
Vanguard 
40% in S&P 500 ETF VUSA
30% in FTSE 250 ETF VMID
30% in FTSE100 ETF VUKE

All are marked risk category 6

Age 40
Time to invest 26 years
I understand we don't have a crystal ball..


«1

Comments

  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 25,321 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Is there a particular reason you would exclude Europe, Asia, Japan etc, but include the USA?
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 8 April 2021 at 8:49PM
    Only time will tell if such a split makes a good return. Doubt that you'll find many people holding such a portfolio. 

    Equities by their very nature will carry a higher risk level. Risk premium is your compensation for holding such assets. 

  • Steve182
    Steve182 Posts: 623 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 500 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 8 April 2021 at 9:17PM
    The fastest growing economies for the next couple of decades are forecast to be in Asia, particularly China, India and Vietnam. 

    UK makes up only about 2.5% of world PPP GDP but you propose to put 60% of your investments in the UK. 

    UK may represent good value right now but I would not consider investing >25% in the UK due to poor diversity.
    “Like a bunch of cod fishermen after all the cod’s been overfished, they don’t catch a lot of cod, but they keep on fishing in the same waters. That’s what’s happened to all these value investors. Maybe they should move to where the fish are.”   Charlie Munger, vice chairman, Berkshire Hathaway
  • snowshine
    snowshine Posts: 148 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    masonic said:
    Is there a particular reason you would exclude Europe, Asia, Japan etc, but include the USA?
    No.
    Asian Tigers I heard of but just not comfortable when I hear political unrest
    (Singapore and Taiwan are stable I suppose) 
    I am a novice.
  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 25,321 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    snowshine said:
    masonic said:
    Is there a particular reason you would exclude Europe, Asia, Japan etc, but include the USA?
    No.
    Asian Tigers I heard of but just not comfortable when I hear political unrest
    (Singapore and Taiwan are stable I suppose) 
    I am a novice.
    There's political unrest within the UK at the moment.
  • JohnWinder
    JohnWinder Posts: 1,862 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 9 April 2021 at 6:59AM
    I think you’re on the right track with diversified, low cost, funds tracking suitable indices, but the true believers in that approach would question why you don’t just choose a global all cap tracker. That would give you the best diversification without trying to pick winning or losing sectors. 
    To suggest there are problems ahead for stocks in Singapore or Taiwan is something enough other investors have considered and so is already factored into the price of those stocks. You’re unlikely to know something that the rest of the world doesn’t know, so probably best to just forget about betting on or against certain sectors. 
    Start early to benefit from compounding, invest as much as you can, choose broad cap weighted index funds and stick to the plan. You could put up a dozen reasons to avoid stocks from somewhere, and someone else could have a dozen reasons to rebut them. 
    You might benefit from thinking about how much home bias you have, and how much currency hedging you have. Otherwise, keep it simple and broad. 
  • IvanOpinion
    IvanOpinion Posts: 22,429 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    If you are intent on Vanguard, why not look at one of their Global funds for the bulk of your portfolio, or even one of the LifeStrategy to provide you with mixed assets ... leave it to them to do any rebalancing and splitting.
    Past caring about first world problems.
  • DrSyn
    DrSyn Posts: 897 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts
    You state you are a novice. As a first investment I think you should instead consider a simple Global Multi Asset Fund which would provide you with a ready made portfolio. There are a number of such funds.

     An alternative would be a cheap Global ETF, like those with the following ticker, VWRL, HMWO,
     
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 118,498 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    snowshine said:
    Vanguard 
    40% in S&P 500 ETF VUSA
    30% in FTSE 250 ETF VMID
    30% in FTSE100 ETF VUKE

    All are marked risk category 6

    Age 40
    Time to invest 26 years
    I understand we don't have a crystal ball..


    Obviously, you haven't bought into the passive investing views.  So, why are you using passive funds when you are so keen to be a fund manager yourself?

    If that spread was put in place under advice, it would probably be classed as a missale due to its poor diversification.  
    Obviously, when you DIY, you are free to choose your own funds but it also means you are able to make your own mistakes.    Currently, you have a poor asset allocation.  You should reconsider.

    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    snowshine said:
    masonic said:
    Is there a particular reason you would exclude Europe, Asia, Japan etc, but include the USA?

    (Singapore and Taiwan are stable I suppose) 

    The Chinese will regain control of Taiwan within the next decade. 
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 347.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 240.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 616.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 175.4K Life & Family
  • 253.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.