We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Help with £210k

2»

Comments

  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 30,417 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    JGB1955 said:
    If you have children, and don't 'need' the money, why not pass it on directly to them now? As long as it's within 2 years of date-of-death you can make a deed of variation to move your inheritance on without fear of IHT.  

    My father died last year and I've passed on 2/3 of my inheritance directly to my children.  They can make far better use of it than me.  I can see them enjoy the money that my 'tight a***d' father would never have spent on them and it takes us back down towards tax free IHT levels ourselves.  Win win!
    As the OP is still working , another option would be to add to a Sipp/DC pension and get some tax relief .
    They could nominate a family member(s) as beneficiaries on their death. Pension pots are not included in IHT calculations.
    However of course they would not get the money now but at some ( hopefully distant) point in the future.
  • steampowered
    steampowered Posts: 6,176 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Are you a higher rate tax payer?

    If so, there would be a significant tax benefit to contributing the maximum amount possible (£40k) per year into your pension so long as you do not exceed your lifetime allowance. 


    Aside from that, you would want to invest the money for the longer term. Personally I would invest in shares (through a diversified investment fund) rather than starting a lettings business by buying a BTL property - because:
    (1) shares have historically outperformed property and that seems likely to continue particularly given the increasing level of regulation in the BTL sector
    (2) the costs involved with letting a property (letting agent fees, maintenance costs, ground/rent service charges) are far higher than with shares
    (3) BTL is highly taxed (rent is taxed as income; shares you can invest a chunk of it through a S&S ISA to keep it entirely tax free)
    (4) it's extra hassle 
    But if you want to start a lettings business and have a good business plan for it that's up to you.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.