We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Royal London United Friendly

garyhall249
Posts: 5 Forumite

Hi,
Royal London want to close the UFIB fund they use to manage my United Friendly with profits life insurance policy, as it is getting too small and transfer my policy to their Royal London Open Fund.
The proposal appears to be reasonable however it is quite involved, I wondered if there was any experience of previous closures or any expert views?
Thanks
Royal London want to close the UFIB fund they use to manage my United Friendly with profits life insurance policy, as it is getting too small and transfer my policy to their Royal London Open Fund.
The proposal appears to be reasonable however it is quite involved, I wondered if there was any experience of previous closures or any expert views?
Thanks
0
Comments
-
The proposal appears to be reasonable however it is quite involved,
Changes to WP funds always requires far more administration and legal activity than a conventional unit linked fund.
I wondered if there was any experience of previous closures or any expert views?Plenty of old WP funds have been merged into others. It's a logical outcome of consolidation of life companies to the few left today. Nothing to fear.
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.1 -
Yes i too have this same policy and they are asking if holders would give them permission to do this .I am thinking it might be okay as it may give better returns at end of policy But it means they will extend the age of payments, in my case from 80yrs to 84yrs, If more people say yes they may go ahead. The paper work was quite a read and i did not fully understand it until after a few reads but i think it is the way to go so the scheme does not get swallowed up in charges and so reducing profits at the end.
It looks like it will take its time as the courts have to approve it.1 -
elle_may said:But it means they will extend the age of payments, in my case from 80yrs to 84yrs
Thanks0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.1K Spending & Discounts
- 243K Work, Benefits & Business
- 597.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.5K Life & Family
- 256K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards