We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a very Happy New Year. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Royal London United Friendly
garyhall249
Posts: 5 Forumite
Hi,
Royal London want to close the UFIB fund they use to manage my United Friendly with profits life insurance policy, as it is getting too small and transfer my policy to their Royal London Open Fund.
The proposal appears to be reasonable however it is quite involved, I wondered if there was any experience of previous closures or any expert views?
Thanks
Royal London want to close the UFIB fund they use to manage my United Friendly with profits life insurance policy, as it is getting too small and transfer my policy to their Royal London Open Fund.
The proposal appears to be reasonable however it is quite involved, I wondered if there was any experience of previous closures or any expert views?
Thanks
0
Comments
-
The proposal appears to be reasonable however it is quite involved,
Changes to WP funds always requires far more administration and legal activity than a conventional unit linked fund.
I wondered if there was any experience of previous closures or any expert views?Plenty of old WP funds have been merged into others. It's a logical outcome of consolidation of life companies to the few left today. Nothing to fear.
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.1 -
Yes i too have this same policy and they are asking if holders would give them permission to do this .I am thinking it might be okay as it may give better returns at end of policy But it means they will extend the age of payments, in my case from 80yrs to 84yrs, If more people say yes they may go ahead. The paper work was quite a read and i did not fully understand it until after a few reads but i think it is the way to go so the scheme does not get swallowed up in charges and so reducing profits at the end.
It looks like it will take its time as the courts have to approve it.1 -
I have a whole of life policy and believe I pay premiums until I am 84, I did not think that was changing under this proposal, am I mistaken?elle_may said:But it means they will extend the age of payments, in my case from 80yrs to 84yrs
Thanks0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.8K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 260K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards