📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Brother’s inheritance and benefits

2»

Comments

  • TELLIT01
    TELLIT01 Posts: 17,866 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper PPI Party Pooper
    calcotti said:
    pmlindyloo said: If your brother is in the support group then it is possible that part of his ESA is contribution based (based on his NI contributions - did he work before receiving benefits?) which is not means tested so he would not lose all of his ESA.
    Would also have contribution based entitlement if transferred from Incapacity Benefit.
    That was my immediate thought as well, but the OP says it was stopped a few years ago and the brother had to reapply.  If it was stopped in error the Conts entitlement would still be in place.  Without more information about why it was stopped it's not possible to be certain about that.
    If the solicitors are the executors of the will, and a beneficiary refuses to accept a bequest, presumably there is a point at which it will be distributed to other beneficiaries.  That has the potential to leave the brother without the funds but deemed still to have them due to Deprivation of Capital rules.  It could get messy.  In fact it could already be messy but nobody realises it.

  • pmlindyloo
    pmlindyloo Posts: 13,088 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I think the priority is to find out exactly what happened as regards this inheritance.

    I am not familiar with the law - if he refused the inheritance outright what would have happened to the money?  Does anyone know?

    The OP’s father died in 2018 -at least two years ago. 
  • moneyfranc
    moneyfranc Posts: 16 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Time seems to contract, in fact our father died 4 years ago. I’m going to start by ringing the solicitor.
  • calcotti
    calcotti Posts: 15,696 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 3 April 2021 at 5:48PM
    TELLIT01 said:
    calcotti said:
    pmlindyloo said: If your brother is in the support group then it is possible that part of his ESA is contribution based (based on his NI contributions - did he work before receiving benefits?) which is not means tested so he would not lose all of his ESA.
    Would also have contribution based entitlement if transferred from Incapacity Benefit.
    That was my immediate thought as well, but the OP says it was stopped a few years ago and the brother had to reapply.  
    I missed that. Apologies. You're right it will depend on why they stopped and then restarted.
    Information I post is for England unless otherwise stated. Some rules may be different in other parts of UK.
  • Mojisola
    Mojisola Posts: 35,571 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I think the priority is to find out exactly what happened as regards this inheritance.
    I am not familiar with the law - if he refused the inheritance outright what would have happened to the money? 
    The inheritance would go to the OP as the only other beneficiary but the DWP would consider the refusal to accept the inheritance as deliberate deprivation of capital and assess the brother as if he had received the money.
    Worst of both worlds - benefits reduced but no inheritance to use to replace the benefits.
  • birdofafeather
    birdofafeather Posts: 31 Forumite
    10 Posts First Anniversary
    edited 4 April 2021 at 7:52PM
    Mojisola said:
    I think the priority is to find out exactly what happened as regards this inheritance.
    I am not familiar with the law - if he refused the inheritance outright what would have happened to the money? 
    The inheritance would go to the OP as the only other beneficiary but the DWP would consider the refusal to accept the inheritance as deliberate deprivation of capital and assess the brother as if he had received the money.
    Worst of both worlds - benefits reduced but no inheritance to use to replace the benefits.
    Although surely at that moment any right-thinking family member would put the money aside to give to the brother when he realises he has naff all benefits coming in. 
  • moneyfranc
    moneyfranc Posts: 16 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Thanks @birdofafeather, obviously I’m not going to pocket the money and watch my brother go hungry/ slide into even worse mental health ( which, speaking strictly from a self preservation point of view, would end up in my doorstep as I’m next of kin and there’s no other family involved in supporting him). 
  • Mojisola
    Mojisola Posts: 35,571 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Although surely at that moment any right-thinking family member would put the money aside to give to the brother when he realises he has naff all benefits coming in. 
    I'm sure that most family members would do so but that's not the issue.
    Brother doesn't want to accept the inheritance because his benefits will stop - but they will also stop if he refuses it.
    If this is explained to him, maybe he will see sense.
    He already owes the DWP for the benefits he's received since the estate was completed and he will need a lump sum to pay that back.  The longer this goes on, the more chance there will be of him being accused of fraud.
  • TELLIT01
    TELLIT01 Posts: 17,866 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper PPI Party Pooper
    Mojisola said:
    I think the priority is to find out exactly what happened as regards this inheritance.
    I am not familiar with the law - if he refused the inheritance outright what would have happened to the money? 
    The inheritance would go to the OP as the only other beneficiary but the DWP would consider the refusal to accept the inheritance as deliberate deprivation of capital and assess the brother as if he had received the money.
    Worst of both worlds - benefits reduced but no inheritance to use to replace the benefits.
    Although surely at that moment any right-thinking family member would put the money aside to give to the brother when he realises he has naff all benefits coming in. 
    That is benefit fraud, and the person holding the money would be complicit in it.  The brother is the 'beneficial owner' (I think that's the term) of the money and effectively hiding it is still deprivation of capital.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 597.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.6K Life & Family
  • 256.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.