We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

FIREside Chats

Options
1356783

Comments

  • Sholly
    Sholly Posts: 269 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I'm aiming for 57, but my secret target is 52 once I've collected enough years of NI. 
    I thought I should check how many years NI I have as I remember thinking I needed 30ish years to get the state pension, but on the website, it says "You’ll usually need to have 10 qualifying years on your National Insurance record to get any new State Pension" 🙌🏻 that's so much less than l thought. It is "35 qualifying years to get the new full State Pension if you do not have a National Insurance record before 6 April 2016"
  • South_coast
    South_coast Posts: 5,834 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I'm sure when I checked it said I needed 30 🤔 Although I was contributing well before 2016, so it must be the younger folk who are having to put in more years as the Govt thinks they'll live longer. I got a forecast the other week and it said I needed 14 more years, so I'm working with those dates
    Mortgage start: £65,495 (March 2016)
    Cleared 🧚‍♀️🧚‍♀️🧚‍♀️!!! In 5 years, 1 month and 29 days
    Total amount repaid: £72,307.03. £1.10 repaid for every £1.00 borrowed

    Finally earning interest instead of paying it!!!
  • ElmoR
    ElmoR Posts: 413 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    @Sholly, @South_coast it's 35 years to qualify for full state pension for us older ones too. I think it all changed recently. A friendly person on the 'other' boards explained to me that you can still earn more if for example you babysit your grand children or you can buy them too.
    @rara32 Thanks for those reading tips - I looked up and do like theescapeartist blog. Sent for the book too. Part of this trip is psychological and anything that gets that firmly in it's box is welcome.
    @edinburgher Now I know this is the right place for a chat! The USS pension scheme is now a hybrid (dare I say frankenstein) one. It was a complete, real, shiny unicorn of a final salary scheme when I joined many moons ago. In 2016 it was changed. I could rant a lot about this but won't. It's now a "hybrid" with part benefits (DB) and part contributions (DC)(much like rest of private sector). While workers in universities are considered public employees (with salaries that match), the majority have a private pension scheme, this USS. It's big and it's the only one we can receive the employers contributions into. The DB part is capped and I make maximum use of it. Beyond that salary cap, you pay into a DC pot. I also had some AVCs for extra years that started in 2002 and I have hung onto those, still paying for them. They were old pension and worth their weight in gold. So my additional, additional payments were going into the DC pot. The FIL felt that the 13 funds run by the USS were not great, too little equities exposure. You can find them on the tinternet - USS Growth Fund and USS Moderate Growth Fund are the ones I'm in (80:20). I have to factor in some anger too, having lost the final salary pension hurts. Moving the goalposts also feeds the worry. Fast forward a few more years and their is another consultation going on because the scheme is not seen as sustainable. It is likely that the DB will be either scrapped or eroded again. So when I say I have a predicted benefit income of £22K, that could be reduced to £15K if they make such changes. That would require perhaps double-ish what I am initially aiming for - £140K v £70K in the next 8 years. So much less feasible. My updates here will likely obsess about the current status for the next 8 years! Young people are getting the raw deal - huge inter-generational inequities happening. I'm midway in all this, hence half unicorn and half not.

    Is Strathclyde Pension within the USS?
    Why the H&L SIPP? That was partly my FIL input. He uses it and loves it. I have found the website really easy to use. There are explanations for everything in easy to find, logical places and a complete lack of jargon. You can also build a portfolio (or choose one if you want) on a much wider range of stuff. The fees are slightly higher than Vanguard at 0.45%. I'm also trying to work out if I just paid a fee for buying some stocks?! I have a regular monthly purchase set up but it hasn't swung into action yet, so am waiting to see what happens...Plus I had some bonus money to invest, so I did a one off buy, and that's where I think I got stung with fees? I'll email them and ask, they respond very quickly to emails, also good. This is where I feel a bit embarrassed in case maybe I have made a mistake - I like Investment Trusts because they spread across a sector. I realise that in choosing some, it's not as passive as the Vanguard S&S ISA 80:20 product. I already separately have the (Foreign and Colonial) BMO Smaller Global Companies one doing us proud the past 17 years. To add to that I signed up for a drip feed into Mercantile, Brunner, Finsbury Growth and Income and Vanguard ETF All World UCITS (no idea what all that means) VWRP accumulation fund. Plus I read that Fidelity Multi Asset Allocator Fund was a good alternative for the Vanguard passive range and have a small drip into there too. The Trusts are a spread of UK equities and world ones in different sectors? Note all the question marks :D In doing this, I believe (?) that I'm adding that larger equities exposure that the USS isn't covering. In theory (?) this means that the USS is taking a medium ish risk pathway, the Vanguard S&S ISA is a lower risk pathway, and the H&L SIPP (about a third of the money contributed in total) is higher risk?!
    As @floraandfauna points out (thank you!!), the plan is there, not quite fully swung into operation, but it can change as I read more. Or get helpful feedback too hopefully. The H&L fees is something I need to get my head around first. And the relative risk between the USS and the spread of Trusts. Salary sacrifice was super convenient, but I have lost my trust in the USS scheme (to manage effectively/efficiently) - they have limped from one crisis to another since the 2010s. Beware those with DB schemes, they do occasionally get eroded/taken away mid way.

    ElmoR

  • ElmoR
    ElmoR Posts: 413 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Ha! They are less than a £1000 too! :D
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.