We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Disiplinary hearing

135

Comments

  • Juneyggg
    Juneyggg Posts: 23 Forumite
    10 Posts
    Oh sorry forgot to add, this was asked after the appeal hearing and on advice I said no,they previously had ample time but they kept dismissing it so I wasn't prepared to discuss it at this late stage
  • Undervalued
    Undervalued Posts: 9,881 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Juneyggg said:
    I haven't discussed this with anyone until the outcome,however it is at appeal part and I haven't been advised not to discuss.
    As I have stated it was not a fair process,they didn't stick to acas procedures and I am not prepared to just accept it.
    As I explained earlier, ACAS "statutory procedures" no longer exist, only guidelines. Failure to follow the guidelines will not, in itself, mean that you have a winnable case.

    You may well valid grounds to claim unfair dismissal. You are being advised by your union, hopefully at a professional level and not just a lay rep. Be guided by them and concentrate on the valid points.

  • Juneyggg
    Juneyggg Posts: 23 Forumite
    10 Posts
    I had the top man from the union,he is in charge for scotland
  • oh_really
    oh_really Posts: 907 Forumite
    500 Posts First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Juneyggg said:
    I had the top man from the union,he is in charge for scotland
    Some of the lay reps are more effective.

  • Juneyggg
    Juneyggg Posts: 23 Forumite
    10 Posts
    Hubby is an official for union and I couldn't use him hence the  top man
  • Juneyggg
    Juneyggg Posts: 23 Forumite
    10 Posts
    I wanted to check if anybody else had been through the same as me with a company not following guidelines etc, hope that satisfies you.
  • Juneyggg
    Juneyggg Posts: 23 Forumite
    10 Posts
    That last comment wasn't meant to be abrubt,apologies 
  • Juneyggg said:
    I wanted to check if anybody else had been through the same as me with a company not following guidelines etc, hope that satisfies you.
    As has been posted above, a company is not obliged to follow the guidelines, and then choosing not to do so isn’t any sort of mark against them, or something that may help you “get off.”

    You need to focus on the facts and the allegations, not any possible technical errors. It’s not a court of law, so there’s no “gotcha” through an imperfectly applied process.
  • Juneyggg
    Juneyggg Posts: 23 Forumite
    10 Posts
    Employers must follow a fair process, so how can not being able to answer the evidence they have a technicality as far as I am concerned I have a right to defend myself . 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.