We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Disiplinary hearing
Comments
-
Oh sorry forgot to add, this was asked after the appeal hearing and on advice I said no,they previously had ample time but they kept dismissing it so I wasn't prepared to discuss it at this late stage0
-
As I explained earlier, ACAS "statutory procedures" no longer exist, only guidelines. Failure to follow the guidelines will not, in itself, mean that you have a winnable case.Juneyggg said:I haven't discussed this with anyone until the outcome,however it is at appeal part and I haven't been advised not to discuss.
As I have stated it was not a fair process,they didn't stick to acas procedures and I am not prepared to just accept it.
You may well valid grounds to claim unfair dismissal. You are being advised by your union, hopefully at a professional level and not just a lay rep. Be guided by them and concentrate on the valid points.
1 -
I had the top man from the union,he is in charge for scotland0
-
Hubby is an official for union and I couldn't use him hence the top man0
-
Well if your husband is a union rep and you are being advised by the "top man", I an not entirely sure what you hope to gain from posting here?Juneyggg said:Hubby is an official for union and I couldn't use him hence the top man9 -
I wanted to check if anybody else had been through the same as me with a company not following guidelines etc, hope that satisfies you.0
-
That last comment wasn't meant to be abrubt,apologies2
-
As has been posted above, a company is not obliged to follow the guidelines, and then choosing not to do so isn’t any sort of mark against them, or something that may help you “get off.”Juneyggg said:I wanted to check if anybody else had been through the same as me with a company not following guidelines etc, hope that satisfies you.
You need to focus on the facts and the allegations, not any possible technical errors. It’s not a court of law, so there’s no “gotcha” through an imperfectly applied process.2 -
Employers must follow a fair process, so how can not being able to answer the evidence they have a technicality as far as I am concerned I have a right to defend myself .0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards