We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
MOT Test - quick question..
Comments
-
but OP said they were advisories last year that are not yet resolved. In which case it would be worth fixing to avoid issues in the longer termdipsomaniac said:
You don't need to fix advisories immediatelyhomeless9 said:
yeah - should be easy for them to fit. Even if they don't have stock that's fine as I'll get them to fix any advisories and pick the car up the next day so they'll have plenty of time to get hold of a lightbulb and fit it.AdrianC said:Advisories are "pass - but you may want to know".
Yes, a failed sidelight bulb will be dealt with as "PRS" - Pass, rectify at station - and they'll then charge you on top of the test for any time taken to replace the bulb, unless it's trivially quick and easy.
Your call as to whether it's easier to get it done yourself today or leave it to the garage when they test it.Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.0 -
depends on the advisories. i have had one that has appeared most years for the last 18 years - crack n/s mirrorjimjames said:
but OP said they were advisories last year that are not yet resolved. In which case it would be worth fixing to avoid issues in the longer termdipsomaniac said:
You don't need to fix advisories immediatelyhomeless9 said:
yeah - should be easy for them to fit. Even if they don't have stock that's fine as I'll get them to fix any advisories and pick the car up the next day so they'll have plenty of time to get hold of a lightbulb and fit it.AdrianC said:Advisories are "pass - but you may want to know".
Yes, a failed sidelight bulb will be dealt with as "PRS" - Pass, rectify at station - and they'll then charge you on top of the test for any time taken to replace the bulb, unless it's trivially quick and easy.
Your call as to whether it's easier to get it done yourself today or leave it to the garage when they test it."The Holy Writ of Gloucester Rugby Club demands: first, that the forwards shall win the ball; second, that the forwards shall keep the ball; and third, the backs shall buy the beer." - Doug Ibbotson1 -
You don't need to fix advisories.dipsomaniac said:
You don't need to fix advisories immediatelyhomeless9 said:
yeah - should be easy for them to fit. Even if they don't have stock that's fine as I'll get them to fix any advisories and pick the car up the next day so they'll have plenty of time to get hold of a lightbulb and fit it.AdrianC said:Advisories are "pass - but you may want to know".
Yes, a failed sidelight bulb will be dealt with as "PRS" - Pass, rectify at station - and they'll then charge you on top of the test for any time taken to replace the bulb, unless it's trivially quick and easy.
Your call as to whether it's easier to get it done yourself today or leave it to the garage when they test it.0 -
Seconded, Car seats give me advisories every year.scrappy_returns said:
You don't need to fix advisories.dipsomaniac said:
You don't need to fix advisories immediatelyhomeless9 said:
yeah - should be easy for them to fit. Even if they don't have stock that's fine as I'll get them to fix any advisories and pick the car up the next day so they'll have plenty of time to get hold of a lightbulb and fit it.AdrianC said:Advisories are "pass - but you may want to know".
Yes, a failed sidelight bulb will be dealt with as "PRS" - Pass, rectify at station - and they'll then charge you on top of the test for any time taken to replace the bulb, unless it's trivially quick and easy.
Your call as to whether it's easier to get it done yourself today or leave it to the garage when they test it.0 -
Because the tester is not allowed - for obvious reasons - to move the seat, so cannot test the belt in that seat.mluton said:
Seconded, Car seats give me advisories every year.scrappy_returns said:
You don't need to fix advisories.dipsomaniac said:
Likewise, people often complain about an advisory for an undertray. The reason for that is because, again, the tester is not allowed to remove it, so cannot check what may be hiding behind it...
https://mattersoftesting.blog.gov.uk/horror-story-more-hidden-corrosion/
The tester's mantra - if in doubt, pass and advise.0 -
I must be having a dumb day as I can't figure out the obvious reason for that.AdrianC said:
Because the tester is not allowed - for obvious reasons - to move the seat, so cannot test the belt in that seat.mluton said:
Seconded, Car seats give me advisories every year.scrappy_returns said:
You don't need to fix advisories.dipsomaniac said:
What happens if the owner/driver is of short stature and has the seat fully forward and the tester is 6' 8'' tall with a huge beer belly and can't get in the driver's seat.
Have I misunderstood something?A man walked into a car showroom.
He said to the salesman, “My wife would like to talk to you about the Volkswagen Golf in the showroom window.”
Salesman said, “We haven't got a Volkswagen Golf in the showroom window.”
The man replied, “You have now mate".0 -
I think that the reference is to positions where child seats may be placed. The testers don't test the belt that is securing the child seat.Belenus said:
I must be having a dumb day as I can't figure out the obvious reason for that.AdrianC said:
Because the tester is not allowed - for obvious reasons - to move the seat, so cannot test the belt in that seat.mluton said:
Seconded, Car seats give me advisories every year.scrappy_returns said:
You don't need to fix advisories.dipsomaniac said:
What happens if the owner/driver is of short stature and has the seat fully forward and the tester is 6' 8'' tall with a huge beer belly and can't get in the driver's seat.
Have I misunderstood something?2 -
Thanks. I find it odd that an important safety feature can't be checked.olgadapolga said:
I think that the reference is to positions where child seats may be placed. The testers don't test the belt that is securing the child seat.Belenus said:
I must be having a dumb day as I can't figure out the obvious reason for that.AdrianC said:
Because the tester is not allowed - for obvious reasons - to move the seat, so cannot test the belt in that seat.mluton said:
Seconded, Car seats give me advisories every year.scrappy_returns said:
You don't need to fix advisories.dipsomaniac said:
What happens if the owner/driver is of short stature and has the seat fully forward and the tester is 6' 8'' tall with a huge beer belly and can't get in the driver's seat.
Have I misunderstood something?
Would it not make sense for the government to allow that belt to be checked or to make it mandatory for the owner/driver to remove all child seats when taking a vehicle for a MOT? They could be left on the back seat or in the boot.
Is there a good reason why that can't be done? I have never had child seats in any car I have owned so I am not really familiar with them..A man walked into a car showroom.
He said to the salesman, “My wife would like to talk to you about the Volkswagen Golf in the showroom window.”
Salesman said, “We haven't got a Volkswagen Golf in the showroom window.”
The man replied, “You have now mate".0 -
Installing some car seats properly is incredibly complicated set of threading the belt through hoops and clips pulling it tight etc. If my wife dropped the kid off at nursery then took the car for an MOT where the car seat was removed she would be stuck to pick the kid up after. This guy does it easily now try it in the back of a Ford Puma (original not the SUV). https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sBN05I3alIABelenus said:
Thanks. I find it odd that an important safety feature can't be checked.olgadapolga said:
I think that the reference is to positions where child seats may be placed. The testers don't test the belt that is securing the child seat.Belenus said:
I must be having a dumb day as I can't figure out the obvious reason for that.AdrianC said:
Because the tester is not allowed - for obvious reasons - to move the seat, so cannot test the belt in that seat.mluton said:
Seconded, Car seats give me advisories every year.scrappy_returns said:
You don't need to fix advisories.dipsomaniac said:
What happens if the owner/driver is of short stature and has the seat fully forward and the tester is 6' 8'' tall with a huge beer belly and can't get in the driver's seat.
Have I misunderstood something?
Would it not make sense for the government to allow that belt to be checked or to make it mandatory for the owner/driver to remove all child seats when taking a vehicle for a MOT? They could be left on the back seat or in the boot.
Is there a good reason why that can't be done? I have never had child seats in any car I have owned so I am not really familiar with them..0 -
If I have an obvious MOT fail item, I'll get it fixed first, either myself or get the MOT garage to do it. My car's going in tomorrow and needs a new front plate, the current one's cracked. (And was fitted with security screws so I don't feel like dealing with unscrewing them myself.)Granted, that's with my car where I don't expect the MOT to find uneconomical-to-repair faults.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
