We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Should there have been safety glass?
Comments
-
As other posters have said, safety film seems the obvious thing. Will also disguise any difference in the panes assuming its a slightly frosted look.
0 -
No, not really.davilown said:it’s difficult to replace glass that’s potentially a few hundred years old!
If the glass's unevenness was part of a cosmetic feature of the property, then architectural salvage will be able to supply similar. If a cosmetic feature of the property has been replaced by a non-equivalent replacement, then that could well be an allowable deduction for the landlord from the deposit.
Of course, it may just be straightforward glass in a door that's not part of the heritage of the property.
Replacing a pane like-for-like would not, AIUI, need to conform to BR. In addition, if the pane was indeed just 300x600 (0.18m2), I don't believe it would need to conform to BR even in a newbuild, since the minimum is 450x450 AND 0.33m2, even though 1200 from the floor is within the height.
https://www.planningportal.co.uk/info/200130/common_projects/14/doors_and_windows/2
A neurotypical 15yo would be entirely personally liable for their own actions - only the scale of their ASD can determine if they should have been supervised or not... It certainly isn't the landlord's fault that the kid stumbled and fell against the door, not least because he's been living there for four years so can safely be assumed to be familiar with the fact there is a step there.2 -
It sounds like a true accident. These things happen, and thankfully it sounds like there wasn't a significant injury.Let the landlord know that it happened, offer to replace the glass and discuss replacement options. It might be that if you offer to pay for "normal" glass like for like to replace what was there, the landlord may be interested in upgrading to safety glass.It could also be worth a call to your contents insurance as some will cover this sort of accidental damage. Though equally might not be worth it, as glass isn't expensive.1
-
The LL doesn't have to accept mismatched panes.. It may not be that hard by searching in places that receive glass from buildings torn down etc. Alternatively, perhaps replace all panes with newer ones, so at least they match.davilown said:
They shouldn’t do - it’s difficult to replace glass that’s potentially a few hundred years old!flipflopflo said:
We will replace it. Hopefully the landlord won't gripe about one different pane when they do the inspection in 2 weeks.davilown said:
And what would that achieve? As stated before, it’s an old house and glass in the windows does not have to be up to current modern standards.theartfullodger said:You could try suing landlord referencing Defective Premises Act 1972 - see- but you might not win.'phone Shelter to discuss, 0808 800 4444
A teenager breaks a window - it happens, on a regular basis. replace the glass (with a more modern a safety glass if required) and get over it. (I remember doing it myself many years ago)1 -
Thanks for all your thoughts on the matter. I will take them on board.0
-
If it were me I would mention it the LL before you go to the trouble of replacing it or you could end up paying out twice!"You've been reading SOS when it's just your clock reading 5:05 "3
-
The pane wasn't defective within the meaning of the Act. Not being up to modern standards isn't a defect, and there's no requirement (absent any specific legislation) to bring old things up to current standards. Something has to be broken / missing for it to fall within the parameters of the Defective Premises Act. There's usually an overlap with the Landlord and Tenant Act, depending on what notice a landlord had about a defect, when it comes to personal injury claims against a landlord.theartfullodger said:You could try suing landlord referencing Defective Premises Act 1972 - see- but you might not win.'phone Shelter to discuss, 0808 800 4444
I see OP doesn't want to make a claim anyway. The important thing is that their son will be ok long term.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

