We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
SDLT holiday eligible? - sold last main residence 2 years ago but have overseas investment property
[Deleted User]
Posts: 0 Newbie
Hi all,
I'm sorry for hijacking the other thread and causing confusion.
I sold my previous main residence two years ago but own an overseas investment property which has never been my residence. I suppose my question is - does the additional property rule trump the fact that I sold my previous residence two years ago meaning I would not get the SDLT break or does the fact that I sold my previous residence within three years trump the additional property rule?
Thanks in advance!
I'm sorry for hijacking the other thread and causing confusion.
I sold my previous main residence two years ago but own an overseas investment property which has never been my residence. I suppose my question is - does the additional property rule trump the fact that I sold my previous residence two years ago meaning I would not get the SDLT break or does the fact that I sold my previous residence within three years trump the additional property rule?
Thanks in advance!
0
Comments
-
The fact that you sold a previous home within the last three years could trump the fact that you own another property. There are five conditions to meet which you will find in HMRC's guidance here https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/stamp-duty-land-tax-manual/sdltm09800 The main ones to watch out for are:
(a) You last lived in the previous property as your only or main residence at some point in the three years leading up the completion of the purchase of your new home.
(b) You intend to live in the property you are buying as your only or main home.
The position could be complicated if you are buying jointly with someone else, or if you have a spouse / civil partner with property interests.
2 -
Thanks for sharing. I do intend to live in the new property as my new main residence.SDLT_Geek said:The fact that you sold a previous home within the last three years could trump the fact that you own another property. There are five conditions to meet which you will find in HMRC's guidance here https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/stamp-duty-land-tax-manual/sdltm09800 The main ones to watch out for are:
(a) You last lived in the previous property as your only or main residence at some point in the three years leading up the completion of the purchase of your new home.
(b) You intend to live in the property you are buying as your only or main home.
The position could be complicated if you are buying jointly with someone else, or if you have a spouse / civil partner with property interests.
In relation to point 4 "The purchaser must have lived in the old property as the purchaser’s only or main residence at some point in the three-year period preceding the date of the purchase of the new property [Para 3(6) (c)]. This is the three-year occupation rule.",
Does the "three year occupation rule" mean I must have lived in the old property for three consecutive years or simply lived in it as my main residence at some point within the last three years? Thanks again
0 -
At some point in the last three years. So for example, if you lived in it for 5 years, having moved out in June 2018, then you would need to complete your upcoming purchase by June 2021 so as to be within three years of last having lived in the old property as your only or main residence.Saint4805 said:
In relation to point 4 "The purchaser must have lived in the old property as the purchaser’s only or main residence at some point in the three-year period preceding the date of the purchase of the new property [Para 3(6) (c)]. This is the three-year occupation rule.",
Does the "three year occupation rule" mean I must have lived in the old property for three consecutive years or simply lived in it as my main residence at some point within the last three years? Thanks again
0 -
I sold it in March 2019 and lived in it for several months leading up to the sale and so it sounds like I am also meeting that criteria. Thanks again.SDLT_Geek said:
At some point in the last three years. So for example, if you lived in it for 5 years, having moved out in June 2018, then you would need to complete your upcoming purchase by June 2021 so as to be within three years of last having lived in the old property as your only or main residence.Saint4805 said:
In relation to point 4 "The purchaser must have lived in the old property as the purchaser’s only or main residence at some point in the three-year period preceding the date of the purchase of the new property [Para 3(6) (c)]. This is the three-year occupation rule.",
Does the "three year occupation rule" mean I must have lived in the old property for three consecutive years or simply lived in it as my main residence at some point within the last three years? Thanks again0 -
To live in a property for several months might not meet the bill. For the occupation to be as a main or only residence, it needs to be with “a sufficient degree of permanence and expectation of continuity”.0
-
It was actually my main residence for over three years leading up to the sale. I just happened to rent it out twice on two short term lets in the final year leading up to the sale in March 2019. The final short term let ended in late 2018 and I lived in it again from then until it was sold in March 2019.SDLT_Geek said:To live in a property for several months might not meet the bill. For the occupation to be as a main or only residence, it needs to be with “a sufficient degree of permanence and expectation of continuity”.0 -
You will need to look at the arrangements here in some detail to see if the 3% surcharge is due. The property was clearly not your residence when it was let out.Saint4805 said:
It was actually my main residence for over three years leading up to the sale. I just happened to rent it out twice on two short term lets in the final year leading up to the sale in March 2019. The final short term let ended in late 2018 and I lived in it again from then until it was sold in March 2019.SDLT_Geek said:To live in a property for several months might not meet the bill. For the occupation to be as a main or only residence, it needs to be with “a sufficient degree of permanence and expectation of continuity”.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards