We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Admin fees for Ground rent in arrears
Comments
-
i just talk to the mainstay and they confirm that there won't be additional charge/ fees on top of the £96, as long as i pay my ground rent on time going forward. so there is no cost in pursuing a complaint/ appeal.
can anyone comment on the two grounds i used for my proposed appeal?0 -
i am not planning to go to court to challenge it. and as mentioned the £96 will just be carried over until i paid them off.NameUnavailable said:Bear in mind if you go to tribunal that any costs incurred by the management company might be passed back to you under the service charge - check what your lease says.Challenging £96, and winning, could cost you several thousand if they employ solicitors to deal with the case !
0 -
Cool100 said:
i am not planning to go to court to challenge it. and as mentioned the £96 will just be carried over until i paid them off.NameUnavailable said:Bear in mind if you go to tribunal that any costs incurred by the management company might be passed back to you under the service charge - check what your lease says.Challenging £96, and winning, could cost you several thousand if they employ solicitors to deal with the case !
So just to be clear - you very clearly told them that you would not be paying the £96 at this stage, and they said that was OK?
You probably need to get that confirmed in writing.1. they only issue the chasers by post which were sent to the old address, question is should they also chase via email, given the invoice was sent via email in the first place?- Did they agree that they would send chasers by email?
- Did you inform them of your correct address?
2. the £96 admin fee is 32% of the ground rent amount, is it a fair amount? if yes, how can they justify it?
As explained in a previous post - the 32% bit is irrelevant. The law says that they can charge you for their reasonable time and costs (as explained in the previous post). So you need to ask/decide how much time they spent on sending you the two letters.
0 -
Not sure what you mean by 'carried over' - from your post above I think they have told you that if you pay up now (including the £96) then there won't be any further costs. If they end up having to chase you for the £96 then I would bet they'll be adding further charges on top!Cool100 said:
i am not planning to go to court to challenge it. and as mentioned the £96 will just be carried over until i paid them off.NameUnavailable said:Bear in mind if you go to tribunal that any costs incurred by the management company might be passed back to you under the service charge - check what your lease says.Challenging £96, and winning, could cost you several thousand if they employ solicitors to deal with the case !
0 -
they explicitly told me there won't be any chasers for me not paying the £96, as long as i pay the ground rent on time going forward.NameUnavailable said:
Not sure what you mean by 'carried over' - from your post above I think they have told you that if you pay up now (including the £96) then there won't be any further costs. If they end up having to chase you for the £96 then I would bet they'll be adding further charges on top!Cool100 said:
i am not planning to go to court to challenge it. and as mentioned the £96 will just be carried over until i paid them off.NameUnavailable said:Bear in mind if you go to tribunal that any costs incurred by the management company might be passed back to you under the service charge - check what your lease says.Challenging £96, and winning, could cost you several thousand if they employ solicitors to deal with the case !
the £96 will just be sitting in my account indefinitely until the property is sold.0 -
regarding the size of the admin fee, if they cannot justify it based on how much effort/ time they spent on the chasers, then do i have a case?eddddy said:Cool100 said:
i am not planning to go to court to challenge it. and as mentioned the £96 will just be carried over until i paid them off.NameUnavailable said:Bear in mind if you go to tribunal that any costs incurred by the management company might be passed back to you under the service charge - check what your lease says.Challenging £96, and winning, could cost you several thousand if they employ solicitors to deal with the case !
So just to be clear - you very clearly told them that you would not be paying the £96 at this stage, and they said that was OK?
You probably need to get that confirmed in writing.1. they only issue the chasers by post which were sent to the old address, question is should they also chase via email, given the invoice was sent via email in the first place?- Did they agree that they would send chasers by email?
- Did you inform them of your correct address?
2. the £96 admin fee is 32% of the ground rent amount, is it a fair amount? if yes, how can they justify it?
As explained in a previous post - the 32% bit is irrelevant. The law says that they can charge you for their reasonable time and costs (as explained in the previous post). So you need to ask/decide how much time they spent on sending you the two letters.
regarding the method used for chasers, they didn't agree to do via email, but at the same time they didn't inform / explain in advance that it will only be done via post either, so do i have a case here due to this ambiguity?0 -
So you're just deferring paying the £96 until later?0
-
no not really, my previous comments are just responding to the questions others have asked me.Seashell517 said:So you're just deferring paying the £96 until later?
my aim is to successfully appeal against this, so it would be very helpful if people can kindly advise on whether the two grounds i used are good enough, or any other suggestions for a successful appeal.
thanks0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards