We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Faulty car part, can I reclaim the Garage Labour fees?
Comments
-
Its a pity that Euro Car Parts don't offer garages that spend around £10K a month with them the same cost for a part that I could buy online from them for £60 less.peter_the_piper said:Pity the garage did not buy and fit the part, it would have been down to them to sort it out.
The garage have the same option as myself to put in a Labour Claim and that's what they do in this situation0 -
So does that ('consequential rights) mean I can not claim as a consumer for loss of additional labour costs?bris said:
No, it's a consequential loss for faulty goods, a consumers right.born_again said:Is it not going to depend on what you agreed with the garage about fitting the part & any costs if it was faulty.
The OP states it wasn't put through any of his businesses so it was bought as a consumer. If the part was also fitted as a consumer and nor billed to any of his businesses then there is consequential rights here.0 -
Many traders don't, with that as one of the reasons.born_again said:
Thats crazy.bris said:
No, it's a consequential loss for faulty goods, a consumers right.born_again said:Is it not going to depend on what you agreed with the garage about fitting the part & any costs if it was faulty.
The OP states it wasn't put through any of his businesses so it was bought as a consumer. If the part was also fitted as a consumer and nor billed to any of his businesses then there is consequential rights here.
Makes you wonder why anyone would even entertain fitting a customers part when they could end up out of pocket if the part is faulty/wrong. Not only from the profit on selling the part, but also all the labour costs.
But surely if the OP had agreed with the garage that it was fit only, then it would not be covered if faulty?0 -
maybe i am misunderstanding but the garage does not lose out - the op still has to pay them for their labour.
what the op can then do is claim this payment from the car part supplier as consequential loss.
happy to be corrected if i am wrong.0 -
I think you're correct, but some tradespeople don't want the hassle of being in the middle of a dispute. You see it a lot when people buy their own plumbing/electrical supplies, for example, to save a few quid, then cause trouble when the tradesperson can't make them fit properly or ends up getting blamed for problems that arise afterwards, when the fault is with the product.pbartlett said:maybe i am misunderstanding but the garage does not lose out - the op still has to pay them for their labour.
what the op can then do is claim this payment from the car part supplier as consequential loss.
happy to be corrected if i am wrong.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards