We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Conservatory confusion - house we are buying
Options
Comments
-
AmmDram said:So, if I just point out the lack of exterior grade doors and the radiator to my solicitor, should she be able to sort something out with the vendor’s solicitor to make it comply?0
-
FreeBear said:AmmDram said: I don’t want to end up in a pickle (or with extra bills for complying with things we weren’t expecting - eg insulation rules and whatnot).Don't worry. The council won't be able to do anything in terms of enforcement, so they won't force you to add loads of insulation or any other work.If you are looking to enlarge/extend, get planning permission and demolish the existing conservatory.0
-
If it was built in the 80s the superstructure will not be worth saving when you come to extend/refurbish, but if the walls are sound you may be able to retain them. Walls that have not cracked or moved away from the house in 40 years or so will have decent foundations.Building inspectors are usually reasonable people. Mine merely noted the exterior grade doors when checking the refurbishment of our house and took no further interest in the new conservatory, which was within permitted development size. If he noticed the radiator in there he didn't say anything! To be fair, it's hardly ever needed and remains turned to frost level apart from very rare occasions in winter.To be clear, any conservatory with a glass roof will almost certainly not comply with heat loss values in the building regs. Ours has double skinned insulated walls, 100mm insulation in the floor and a solar glass roof and it's still non-compliant. Doesn't bother us.1
-
Davesnave said:If it was built in the 80s the superstructure will not be worth saving when you come to extend/refurbish, but if the walls are sound you may be able to retain them. Walls that have not cracked or moved away from the house in 40 years or so will have decent foundations.Building inspectors are usually reasonable people. Mine merely noted the exterior grade doors when checking the refurbishment of our house and took no further interest in the new conservatory, which was within permitted development size. If he noticed the radiator in there he didn't say anything! To be fair, it's hardly ever needed and remains turned to frost level apart from very rare occasions in winter.0
-
AmmDram said:Davesnave said:If it was built in the 80s the superstructure will not be worth saving when you come to extend/refurbish, but if the walls are sound you may be able to retain them. Walls that have not cracked or moved away from the house in 40 years or so will have decent foundations.Building inspectors are usually reasonable people. Mine merely noted the exterior grade doors when checking the refurbishment of our house and took no further interest in the new conservatory, which was within permitted development size. If he noticed the radiator in there he didn't say anything! To be fair, it's hardly ever needed and remains turned to frost level apart from very rare occasions in winter.If you are replacing using the original footprint, you wouldn't need permission, so long as its a conservatory separate from the house and assuming no changes in the status of your locality. i.e. it hasn't become a conservation area or similar. It's only if you're turning it into an integral part of the house or making it much larger that you'd need to involve the council.I would say live with what you have for a while and then decide what sort of roof you want and what you want to spend. An opaque roof may cut light levels in the adjoining room to an unacceptable degree and a traditional tiled roof would be unwise on conservatory foundations and would probably need extra support too.If you decide to go for a garden room as a full extension of the house it will add more value and have greater versatility than a conservatory, but it will cost considerably more too. A double glazing company will usually be able to replace the superstructure of a conservatory, but the industry is noted for some sharp practices, so choose carefully. The company I used had been established locally for a long time, but they still attempted to cut corners. The guys knew what exactly they should do according to the manufacturer's guidance, but they would have bodged if I'd let them.If you want a full garden room extension you may need an architect and you'd use a reputable local builder.
0 -
Davesnave said:AmmDram said:Davesnave said:If it was built in the 80s the superstructure will not be worth saving when you come to extend/refurbish, but if the walls are sound you may be able to retain them. Walls that have not cracked or moved away from the house in 40 years or so will have decent foundations.Building inspectors are usually reasonable people. Mine merely noted the exterior grade doors when checking the refurbishment of our house and took no further interest in the new conservatory, which was within permitted development size. If he noticed the radiator in there he didn't say anything! To be fair, it's hardly ever needed and remains turned to frost level apart from very rare occasions in winter.If you are replacing using the original footprint, you wouldn't need permission, so long as its a conservatory separate from the house and assuming no changes in the status of your locality. i.e. it hasn't become a conservation area or similar. It's only if you're turning it into an integral part of the house or making it much larger that you'd need to involve the council.I would say live with what you have for a while and then decide what sort of roof you want and what you want to spend. An opaque roof may cut light levels in the adjoining room to an unacceptable degree and a traditional tiled roof would be unwise on conservatory foundations and would probably need extra support too.If you decide to go for a garden room as a full extension of the house it will add more value and have greater versatility than a conservatory, but it will cost considerably more too. A double glazing company will usually be able to replace the superstructure of a conservatory, but the industry is noted for some sharp practices, so choose carefully. The company I used had been established locally for a long time, but they still attempted to cut corners. The guys knew what exactly they should do according to the manufacturer's guidance, but they would have bodged if I'd let them.If you want a full garden room extension you may need an architect and you'd use a reputable local builder.0
-
AmmDram said:TheProfessional said:We have the same thing, conservatory converted to be part of the house. Internal doors removed totally and roof tiled. No building regulations.
I rang the council about getting it regularised and they said they would have to invasively check it but there was probably no chance it would make regulations as it wouldn't have the thermal properties needed. They said if I was happy with it structurally probably best leaving it well enough alone if I was going to be there long term and the structure sound
1 -
AmmDram said: I’m not sure if it’s a conservation area - the vendor said it isn’t, the surveyor said it is...
Her courage will change the world.
Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards