We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Bond equity correlation reversing?
Comments
-
I have this " Market Summary " bookmarked as a guide. All symbols can be opened in chart form. Regarding individual stocks I find it's handy to look at the sectors to see short term performance. Usually UK sectors have a similar trend.Bobziz said:Thanks John. I acknowledge that my chances of beating the market are low, which is why the majority of my portfolio is in an all world tracker. At this point my active funds have enabled me to get well ahead of the market, but I appreciate that this may swing the other way soon if I don't review my selection.
Market Summary | StockCharts.com
Growth and Value
Eu5kwZGXcAIz3zd (900×676) (twimg.com)
From the Market Summary
IWF | SharpChart | StockCharts.comIWD | SharpChart | StockCharts.com
Article today
3 reasons the rise in bond yields is gaining steam and rattling the stock market - MarketWatch
2 -
You're likely overweight growth because growth has outperformed for a number of years, so has begun to dominate the passive investments. If that reverses and value begins to outperform then it doesn't matter if you're in a passive investment, the rebalancing will occur naturally.Bobziz said:Thanks all, really helpful. So the fact that my portfolio is overweight in growth and underweight in financials and energy in particular is something that I think I need to consider.
It's only really a problem if you've bought growth-only funds and now those funds take up a bigger % of your allocations than you would like.1 -
Indeed, but is the rebalancing in a passive akin to shifting a super tanker ?MaxiRobriguez said:
You're likely overweight growth because growth has outperformed for a number of years, so has begun to dominate the passive investments. If that reverses and value begins to outperform then it doesn't matter if you're in a passive investment, the rebalancing will occur naturally.Bobziz said:Thanks all, really helpful. So the fact that my portfolio is overweight in growth and underweight in financials and energy in particular is something that I think I need to consider.
It's only really a problem if you've bought growth-only funds and now those funds take up a bigger % of your allocations than you would like.
I'm 56% growth, 14% value, so a rapid tweak in direction may be beneficial.0 -
A world tracker is a low target to beat.Bobziz said:I acknowledge that my chances of beating the market are low, which is why the majority of my portfolio is in an all world tracker.0 -
Not for someone with 6 months experience. Small steps...I'm in sponge mode, learning how to invest and finding out what kind of investor I am.Thrugelmir said:
A world tracker is a low target to beat.Bobziz said:I acknowledge that my chances of beating the market are low, which is why the majority of my portfolio is in an all world tracker.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards