We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Geographic diversity of funds
Comments
-
Nor are indexes such as MSCI World as basic as they may appear.Linton said:
Yes, true. Which is why I think that focussing solely on market capitalisation is not an ideal way of choosing the underlying investments for a portfolio.Thrugelmir said:
That's the portfolio concentration in some funds due to the market capitalisation of certain companies.lollynerd said:Linton said:
Or you have a long term allocation strategy and keep to it whatever the market does. I see no reason to believe that the market allocations are optimal for an individual small private investor with objectives very different to that of chasing short term gains which drives the global markets.JohnWinder said:AnotherJoe said:If you want diversity, spread across finance, energy, manufacturing blah blah whatever your chosen sectors are.Or just forget about it and buy global funds, perhaps top 1000 companies or whatever and then small companies. And maybe real estate if you want to diversify more.One does diversify across sectors by owning cap weighted global index funds. One doesn't need to have 'chosen sectors' to be optimally diversified.If one chooses to pick and choose which sectors or which regions to over- or under-weight then you've got a couple of questions to answer (to yourself): how will you decide to 'sell out of' or 'stay with' your strategy if it has underperformed a global index fund at your most recent review of your investment returns, or indeed if it has outperformed?; and secondly, what strategy will you use to decide whether, having 'sold out' (from a 'winning' or 'losing' position compared with the index fund), you will choose a different active strategy or go with indexing?
How can a portfolio be considered optimally diversified when 60% is allocated to one country and 10% is allocated to just 3 companies. Neither figure has any real world justification in terms of GDP, profits, or turnover.
Also, I don't have 10% invested in 3 companies. Maybe you were referring to someone else?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards