We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!

Geographic diversity of funds

13»

Comments

  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 25 February 2021 at 12:58PM
    Linton said:
    lollynerd said:
    Linton said:
    If you want diversity, spread across finance, energy, manufacturing blah blah whatever your chosen sectors are.
    Or just forget about it and buy  global funds, perhaps top 1000 companies or whatever and then small companies. And maybe real estate if you want to diversify more.
    One does diversify across sectors by owning cap weighted global index funds. One doesn't need to have 'chosen sectors' to be optimally diversified.
    If one chooses to pick and choose which sectors or which regions to over- or under-weight then you've got a couple of questions to answer (to yourself): how will you decide to 'sell out of' or 'stay with' your strategy if it has underperformed a global index fund at your most recent review of your investment returns, or indeed if it has outperformed?; and secondly, what strategy will you use to decide whether, having 'sold out' (from a 'winning' or 'losing' position compared with the index fund), you will choose a different active strategy or go with indexing?
    Or you have a long term allocation strategy and keep to it whatever the market does. I see no reason to believe that the market allocations are optimal for an individual small private investor with objectives very different to that of chasing short term gains which drives the global markets.

    How can a portfolio be considered optimally diversified when 60% is allocated to one country and 10% is allocated to just 3 companies. Neither figure has any real world justification in terms of GDP, profits, or turnover.


    Also, I don't have 10% invested in 3 companies. Maybe you were referring to someone else?
    That's the portfolio concentration in some funds due to the market capitalisation of certain companies. 
    Yes,  true.  Which is why I think that focussing solely on market capitalisation is not an ideal way of choosing the underlying investments for a portfolio.
    Nor are indexes such as MSCI World as basic as they may appear. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.