We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

How do fraudsters get away with it?

13»

Comments

  • Malthusian
    Malthusian Posts: 11,055 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I would really like to have the option of increased security on bank accounts.  Let me set in advance how much can be transferred without first needing to speak to someone at the bank to verify my details etc. 
    Banks already do this with daily withdrawal limits, among other security measures. As it's they that are on the hook for frauds, it's their decision what limits to apply, not ours.
    I have been idly wondering how many cases there are of someone falling "victim" to a scammer, having the bank give them all their money back, and then the "scammer" splits the "stolen funds" 50:50 with them.
    Probably not very many, given all the drawbacks: you can't just pay the 50% back into the original account, most people aren't set up to live off laundered money, and there's nothing to stop the scammer keeping the whole 100%.
    But it would be a pretty good story for an advance fee fraud. Most scams involve a suggestion of criminality, to make the riches seem more plausible and exploit the mark's greed while simultaneously deterring them from going to the police - this is the logical extreme.
  • I would really like to have the option of increased security on bank accounts.  Let me set in advance how much can be transferred without first needing to speak to someone at the bank to verify my details etc. 
    Banks already do this with daily withdrawal limits, among other security measures. As it's they that are on the hook for frauds, it's their decision what limits to apply, not ours.
    I have been idly wondering how many cases there are of someone falling "victim" to a scammer, having the bank give them all their money back, and then the "scammer" splits the "stolen funds" 50:50 with them.
    Probably not very many, given all the drawbacks: you can't just pay the 50% back into the original account, most people aren't set up to live off laundered money, and there's nothing to stop the scammer keeping the whole 100%.
    But it would be a pretty good story for an advance fee fraud. Most scams involve a suggestion of criminality, to make the riches seem more plausible and exploit the mark's greed while simultaneously deterring them from going to the police - this is the logical extreme.
    I was referring to online money transfers.
    Think first of your goal, then make it happen!
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.