We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

S&S LISA, good idea to invest in two separate funds, or is that self-defeating?

Apologies if this has been asked before, I tried to use the search function but it was a nightmare.

I've opened a S&S LISA. Deposited £4k in it but not chosen where to invest yet. I was just going to stick with good ol' Vanguard LS (leaning towards 60%), however I'm not completely comfortable with how overexposed this fund is to the UK. So, I thought split my money between two funds; this one, and another more globalised one.

My question is, when investing relatively small amounts (max 4k a year, although some years it may be considerably less than this, - goal is to buy a property within the next 5-10 years), is it worth splitting one's money between two funds in this way? Or does it defeat the point of Vanguard LS?

Comments

  • El_Torro
    El_Torro Posts: 1,942 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If you want to invest in two multi asset funds, even if you're only investing £4k, then that's fine, no harm in doing it. 

    You could argue that if you don't like the overweight UK nature of VLS you could just invest in a fund which isn't overweight in the UK. For example HSBC Global Strategy or Fidelity Multi Asset Allocator. However if you do want to be overweight in the UK, but not as much as VLS, you can mix a couple of funds together.

    It's not the simplest way to invest, but your long term returns shouldn't be harmed by you doing this.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,002 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
     Surely it is bad practice not to confirm in writing following telephone cancellations? How about not sticking it in VLS at all if you are not happy with its weightings?   There are plenty of alternatives.
    My question is, when investing relatively small amounts (max 4k a year, although some years it may be considerably less than this, - goal is to buy a property within the next 5-10 years), is it worth splitting one's money between two funds in this way? Or does it defeat the point of Vanguard LS?

    The amount doesn't warrant having two funds.   Even adding a zero to it doesn't.    

    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • El_Torro said:
    If you want to invest in two multi asset funds, even if you're only investing £4k, then that's fine, no harm in doing it. 

    You could argue that if you don't like the overweight UK nature of VLS you could just invest in a fund which isn't overweight in the UK. For example HSBC Global Strategy or Fidelity Multi Asset Allocator. However if you do want to be overweight in the UK, but not as much as VLS, you can mix a couple of funds together.

    It's not the simplest way to invest, but your long term returns shouldn't be harmed by you doing this.
    Well yes I thought about that but my concern was not having any bonds in the fund? I'm no economist but most of the advice I've read says if you're investing for a short-medium period (as I am), then going all in on equities is pretty risky?
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 28,503 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    El_Torro said:
    If you want to invest in two multi asset funds, even if you're only investing £4k, then that's fine, no harm in doing it. 

    You could argue that if you don't like the overweight UK nature of VLS you could just invest in a fund which isn't overweight in the UK. For example HSBC Global Strategy or Fidelity Multi Asset Allocator. However if you do want to be overweight in the UK, but not as much as VLS, you can mix a couple of funds together.

    It's not the simplest way to invest, but your long term returns shouldn't be harmed by you doing this.
    Well yes I thought about that but my concern was not having any bonds in the fund? I'm no economist but most of the advice I've read says if you're investing for a short-medium period (as I am), then going all in on equities is pretty risky?
    The HSBC and Fidelity funds mentioned both have a choice of risk levels , same as VLS.
    Fidelity Multi asset allocator 'Growth ' has 60% equities but no UK bias.
    HSBC global strategy 'Balanced' has a flexible equity % ( but in the approx region of 60% ) and no UK Bias. 
  • Alexland
    Alexland Posts: 10,183 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Investing in anything over the short term is 'pretty risky' and at current equity and bond market valuations that might even extend into the start of the medium term so for anything less than 5-7 years it might be better to stick with a cash LISA product.
    S&S LISAs are really intended for those investing for 20+ years until age 60+.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.