I've made a Subject Access Request, they've sent me some info but is it enough?

Coupon-mad

''unreasonable''

LOL at that.

No idea how PPC owners/employees do what they do unless they have zero social conscience.  Unbelievable to do what they do and call it a service when they know damn well it isn't.

D_P_Dance

It’s just his/her cut & paste for this quarter,

On the contrary, it is a useful weapon  in our armoury.  Several MPs have taken  robust action when constituents have complained about these companies.  MPs also have the ear of planning committees and, possibly , local landowners

Ignore naysayers who are unaccustomed to blue sky thinking.

AnotherForumite

D_P_Dance said:

It’s just his/her cut & paste for this quarter,

On the contrary, it is a useful weapon  in our armoury.  Several MPs have taken  robust action when constituents have complained about these companies.  MPs also have the ear of planning committees and, possibly , local landowners

Ignore naysayers who are unaccustomed to blue sky thinking.

It also has the potential to dilute what you are trying to achieve if complaints are submitted without merit.

AnotherForumite

Coupon-mad said:

''unreasonable''

LOL at that.

No idea how PPC owners/employees do what they do unless they have zero social conscience.  Unbelievable to do what they do and call it a service when they know damn well it isn't.

Think you misunderstood in the twilight zone, I was actually offering assistance to the OP.
It would be the operator that could look unreasonable if they did not fulfil a workable request i.e. a request for ALL the un-redacted payment data will NEVER be fulfilled.

Will44

KeithP said:

Should your para 3a perhaps use the word driver rather than Defendant - twice?
That would more clearly support the second sentence in your para 2.

Thanks Keith - Sorry if I'm being a bit slow but wouldn't mentioning the driver imply we knew who was driving that day, making the second sentence of para 2 incorrect?

Jenni_D

I suggest you read again what you've put in part 3 and think about how it totally wipes out your declaration in part 2 that you don't know who the driver was on the day. Remember that the Defendant is YOU.

Will44

Jenni_D said:

I suggest you read again what you've put in part 3 and think about how it totally wipes out your declaration in part 2 that you don't know who the driver was on the day. Remember that the Defendant is YOU.

Ok thanks, rookie error corrected. 

Will44

Ok I've amended para 3a to mention driver, not defendant.

Any other advice/feedback gratefully received:

2.       It is admitted that the Defendant was the registered keeper of the vehicle in question but liability is denied. The Defendant does not know who the driver of the vehicle was on the date in question.

3a. On the date in question – XXXX – the driver bought a ticket at the car park and went to the beach. The driver decided to stay longer on the beach, so went back to the car park before the first ticket expired and then bought a second ticket, which was also displayed in the vehicle.

3b. Shortly afterwards the Defendant received a notice from the Claimant claiming a Parking Charge of £100 or £60 if paid within 14 days of the notice. The letter was unclear about why the Defendant was being charged other than providing the time the vehicle entered the car park and the time the vehicle departed the car park. It just said “Reason for issue: Session expired”.

3c. The Defendant later discovered that on the same day friends and a family member had also received a similar Parking Charge notice despite having held tickets for the duration of their stay at the same car park.

3d. The Defendant has since found evidence of multiple car park users at the same location buying tickets but still being issued Parking Charge notices. This evidence will be presented at the appropriate time.

3e. Since the first letter the Defendant has been bombarded with multiple debts collection letters causing significant stress and anxiety. This whole process has also taken up hours of the Defendants time in terms of having to read through the legalities of this situation and make repeated requests for further information.

Jenni_D

Sorry to labour the point, but ... if you don't know who the driver was, how do you know so much about what the driver did or saw? Are you relying on POFA as part of your defence? If not then don't try to weasel-word around it ... if the judge asks you if you were the driver, what will you say?

Coupon-mad

 The Defendant does not know who the driver of the vehicle was on the date in question.

If that is not true, don't say it in a defence signed under a statement of truth, for court...