We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Finding a reliable firm that specializes in setting up a simple property trust

2

Comments

  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 37,837 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    JAX_156 said:
    Thanks again for all your views, although the reasoning for my wanting the trust is still a sound one that I believe suits our circumstances. The kids are also the executors of our will and the plan is that by the time we die there will be little left for them to deal with when they undertake the probate process.
     As trustees and beneficiaries of the trust they will have no admin regarding IHT after 7 years for the house and other assets given, even within this time the estate should be well within our £1m allowance so IHT should not be payable.
    Our main wish is to keep the house in the family as part of our legacy and protect it from divorce claims. We would like one of the kids to live in the house, but they know that they can always rent it out for a good income. If they sell it it would be against our wishes so if they know they will have a huge CGT bill that would help to discourage them from selling the house and they'd keep it in the family as we want.
    I'm sure that there are downsides to putting the house in trust but we are trying to weight this up against the upsides before deciding to go ahead with it.
    If any one know anymore down or up sides please feel free to post a comment.
    You will be dead. It won't matter to you any more. Why dictate to your children what should happen after you are gone - after all, any impact will be on them not on you if they turn out to be reluctant landlords. I don't see the point in trying to dictate from beyond the grave. 
    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
  • Voyager2002
    Voyager2002 Posts: 16,349 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    It is unlikely that creating a trust would achieve what you want to happen, and in any case this is very far from "simple".

    I do have experience with a genuinely simple trust to hold a property and would be pleased to pass on details of the solicitor I used. I am confident that the this solicitor would also advise against what you plan.
  • JGB1955
    JGB1955 Posts: 4,012 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I'm not sure that the beneficiaries will be thanking their late parents.....  A poisoned chalice indeed.
    #2 Saving for Christmas 2024 - £1 a day challenge. £325 of £366
  • Mojisola
    Mojisola Posts: 35,574 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    JAX_156 said:
    Our main wish is to keep the house in the family as part of our legacy
    If they sell it it would be against our wishes so if they know they will have a huge CGT bill that would help to discourage them from selling the house and they'd keep it in the family as we want.
    I've never understood people who want to control their descendents from beyond the grave.

  • I would not be thanking you for making it both difficult and costly to sell a property that your children may not wish to either live in or let out.  Why on earth do you want to try and restrict their options just because you do not want it to ever be sold?  In my opinion that is very selfish planning on your part.  Have you even discussed this with your children?
  • JAX_156 said:
     As trustees and beneficiaries of the trust they will have no admin regarding IHT after 7 years for the house and other assets given, even within this time the estate should be well within our £1m allowance so IHT should not be payable.
    I said this before but you obviously ignored it, so I will repeat it again, the 7 year rule does not apply to gifts with reservation, so the house will never fall out of your estate if you continue to live there after putting it in trust. 
  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 37,837 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 19 February 2021 at 2:36PM
    You also still need to consider the deprivation of assets issue with regards to care costs.
    This can still apply depending on your age, health and the reasons for putting the house in trust at the time.   Plus from a personal perspective, I would much prefer my parents to be able to pay for the care they need (if they need it) than be put somewhere at the lower price bracket and have a poorer quality of life. Luckily parent is in agreement and neither of us anticipate me getting much in the way of an inheritance, which is fine by me. 
    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 46,019 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 19 February 2021 at 5:17PM
    https://helpandadvice.co.uk/family-protection-trusts/

    There is a list of pros and cons in the above - it also points up immediate tax considerations and tax considerations that may arise later as also the expenses that may arise in connection with administration of the Trust.

    See also https://www.which.co.uk/money/wills-and-probate/passing-on-your-money/will-trusts-and-lifetime-trusts-aqmf66w4nu5w
    under
    Lifetime trusts and tax

    See also
    https://www.barkerevanslaw.co.uk/2013/02/whats-wrong-with-asset-protection-trusts/

    Where to look for advice about Asset Protection Trusts

    Look for professionals who are independently regulated and have an enforceable code of conduct, not just a voluntary one. Members of organisations such as Solicitors For The Elderly, the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners and the Society of Later Life Advisers are trained and experienced in the provision of advice in this complex area of later life planning.

  • Thanks again for taking the trouble to post your views.
    There is no need for us to worry about keep_pedalling’s assertion that  the 7 year rule does not apply to gifts with reservation because as we will still should be below the current £1m IHT limit.  I've read  also that if the beneficiary of the trust still lives at the property it would not count as a gift with reservation and we would not need to pay rent for the 7 year rule to apply. .
    The kids would want to keep the house so a D/trust is still under our consideration, but nothing will be done without their approval. Don't know why some of you thought otherwise.
    The other thing which we are considering is to just add add one or both of the kids names on to the deeds with us as tenants in common after 7 years it would greatly reduce the value of our estate as well as protect it from other claims.
    This would be a lot cheaper and much more simpler for us than putting into the house into a trust. 
    Another downside to all options is that our one son will probaly lose £3k available from his right to buy isa whatever we decide.
    Why can't the government make life more simple? The jury is still out !




  • JAX_156 said:
    Thanks again for taking the trouble to post your views.
    There is no need for us to worry about keep_pedalling’s assertion that  the 7 year rule does not apply to gifts with reservation because as we will still should be below the current £1m IHT limit.  I've read  also that if the beneficiary of the trust still lives at the property it would not count as a gift with reservation and we would not need to pay rent for the 7 year rule to apply. .
    The kids would want to keep the house so a D/trust is still under our consideration, but nothing will be done without their approval. Don't know why some of you thought otherwise.
    The other thing which we are considering is to just add add one or both of the kids names on to the deeds with us as tenants in common after 7 years it would greatly reduce the value of our estate as well as protect it from other claims.
    This would be a lot cheaper and much more simpler for us than putting into the house into a trust. 
    Another downside to all options is that our one son will probaly lose £3k available from his right to buy isa whatever we decide.
    Why can't the government make life more simple? The jury is still out !

    You son will not only lose the £3k, your frankly bonkers scheme, will also lose him the first time buyer tax relief on stamp duty. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.7K Life & Family
  • 262.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.