We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
What now for BT..?

C_Mababejive
Posts: 11,668 Forumite


I wonder what people think about BT as an investment? True if you had held it since privatisation (£1.30) you have had 36 years worth of dividends but the share price has ebbed and flowed and has reached the dizzy heights of over £10 and wallowed as low as 98 pence but hat of the future? BT is trying to restructure, it is still a pension fund that sells phones and presumably they are a vulnerable takeover target ? There was also talk of splitting BT and Openreach which seems to have been forgotten for now? Surely things can only get better?
Feudal Britain needs land reform. 70% of the land is "owned" by 1 % of the population and at least 50% is unregistered (inherited by landed gentry). Thats why your slave box costs so much..
0
Comments
-
Not a share I'd single out for special attention. Best held as part of a collective fund investment.0
-
I buy them as a long term thing, not serious money.0
-
May appear to look like good value at the moment but not something I would invest in personally...
“Like a bunch of cod fishermen after all the cod’s been overfished, they don’t catch a lot of cod, but they keep on fishing in the same waters. That’s what’s happened to all these value investors. Maybe they should move to where the fish are.” Charlie Munger, vice chairman, Berkshire Hathaway0 -
Due to the pension liability, I can't see it doing well as pensions can get no decent returns at the moment; just like the rest of us.0
-
Steve182 said:May appear to look like good value at the moment but not something I would invest in personally...
“Like a bunch of cod fishermen after all the cod’s been overfished, they don’t catch a lot of cod, but they keep on fishing in the same waters. That’s what’s happened to all these value investors. Maybe they should move to where the fish are.” Charlie Munger, vice chairman, Berkshire Hathaway0 -
Thanks, i omitted a small detail. I'm just thinking about what current investors should do? what are the prospects for a recovery or is it dead and buried for decades? Maybe a short term wait and see for a covid recovery in line with many investments? It would be a shame to dump and then find it ramp up as a takeover target??Feudal Britain needs land reform. 70% of the land is "owned" by 1 % of the population and at least 50% is unregistered (inherited by landed gentry). Thats why your slave box costs so much..0
-
If I held the share, which I don't. It would treated like any other. List the pros and cons. Consider whether the money would be better used in another opportunity.
Far too often investing becomes emotional. Taking a hit (i.e. realising a loss) isn't in every investors DNA. Do it often enough and you'll learn to become emotionally detached. Just ensure that you have more winners than losers. Run your winners is a better strategy.2 -
Thrugelmir said:If I held the share, which I don't. It would treated like any other. List the pros and cons. Consider whether the money would be better used in another opportunity.
Far too often investing becomes emotional. Taking a hit (i.e. realising a loss) isn't in every investors DNA. Do it often enough and you'll learn to become emotionally detached. Just ensure that you have more winners than losers. Run your winners is a better strategy.'Run your winners' is a glib statement. How exactly do you know you have a winner and not just an over-valued share that you ought to be shot of? How do you know if a share drops whether it is a temporary setback or a permanent change of direction? How do you know some unknown disaster is not about to be revealed that will cause the price to halve or go to worthless as happened with FTSE 100 company NMC?I have had winners that I sold and went on to become bigger winners; winners that I kept that became losers, and losers that I kept (sometimes 95% losers) that went on to become winners. It is nothing like as straightforward as 'taking a hit' and 'run your winners' as you suggest in my experience.
2 -
HansOndabush said:Thrugelmir said:If I held the share, which I don't. It would treated like any other. List the pros and cons. Consider whether the money would be better used in another opportunity.
Far too often investing becomes emotional. Taking a hit (i.e. realising a loss) isn't in every investors DNA. Do it often enough and you'll learn to become emotionally detached. Just ensure that you have more winners than losers. Run your winners is a better strategy.'Run your winners' is a glib statement. How exactly do you know you have a winner and not just an over-valued share that you ought to be shot of?
2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards