We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Changing mortgage offer between exchange & completion
Comments
-
The new product fee might negate some of that saving though. Incidentally, I appreciate it is not particularly important to the general question you are asking, but any reason you are comparing a 5 year on 85% LTV versus a 2 year at 80% LTV? I think it is making the differential look higher than it actually is than if you compared like-for-like; of course 2 year would still be lower but it would be closer I assume.Iwonder2 said:
Although this does not negate the original cost between the two - I fully appreciate this may happen and I look forward to finding out!Thrugelmir said:In 2 years time interest rates may have risen. Then what? All this fluster would have achieved nothing.
I am also glad everything else has gone very well and costs have been low so am thankful overall given the situations that seem to occur on here!
I completely understand why some people always do a 2 year fixed and it would have worked out well over the last decade. Personally I do feel there is a value in that extra certainty of something a bit longer though.0 -
The thing I hate about HSBC is they credit check every time a change takes place ALL the time. It is annoying.0
-
Yes - the reason is because if I had chosen to remortgage (which I have decided not to) I would have chosen 80% LTV 2yr at 2.04% due to believing rates will not sky rocket (if anything 85% has done that due to covid) and realising I had the funds to do so. Effectively by putting down an extra 10k in the deposit you nearly make it up again instead of paying it off in interest - so its a double saving.TN1984 said:The new product fee might negate some of that saving though. Incidentally, I appreciate it is not particularly important to the general question you are asking, but any reason you are comparing a 5 year on 85% LTV versus a 2 year at 80% LTV? I think it is making the differential look higher than it actually is than if you compared like-for-like; of course 2 year would still be lower but it would be closer I assume.
I completely understand why some people always do a 2 year fixed and it would have worked out well over the last decade. Personally I do feel there is a value in that extra certainty of something a bit longer though.
If you were to compare like for like the 5 year 80% would be 2.24% or the 2yr 85% 2.64% - either of which may have been a better solution.
So it's still a large sum extra between 6 - 10k depending which calculation you make. But cheaper than liability for completion and no mortgage and less annoying than it being rejected on the day of exchange and losing buying costs/time!0 -
I wouldnt risk it, what happens if you get refused, and your original mortgage gets cancelled. The you are on the hook for the property as you have already exchanged.
Ill be honest, if the difference in cost is causing you issues, then I think you may have over stretched yourself. Too late now but I would be very weary, whilst its unlikely, if rates do go up and you are struggling at 2.9% then maybe a 5 year fixed is actually a blessing.
Unless you are planning to move in them five years, then I would't worry so much, concentrate on building up some saving and overpay if possible and it will all balance out anyways.0 -
I haven't even read all the detail of the original post. You'd be absolutely mad to risk losing your mortgage between exchange and completion.
Just overpay up to the limit during the fixed period. If you can afford to overpay more, put that money aside in a savings account. At the end of the fixed period, remortgage for the outstanding capital, or less if you've got money in savings to throw at it.0 -
It's not so much the affordability of it.2bFrank said:I wouldnt risk it, what happens if you get refused, and your original mortgage gets cancelled. The you are on the hook for the property as you have already exchanged.
Ill be honest, if the difference in cost is causing you issues, then I think you may have over stretched yourself. Too late now but I would be very weary, whilst its unlikely, if rates do go up and you are struggling at 2.9% then maybe a 5 year fixed is actually a blessing.
Unless you are planning to move in them five years, then I would't worry so much, concentrate on building up some saving and overpay if possible and it will all balance out anyways.
It is the irritation that on a 2.94% you are effectively paying roughly £425 a month in interest and £238 in capital as opposed to at 2.04% you pay £295 interest (if using same borrowing amount - in actual fact due to lower borrowing amount it would be less at £278). This means a monthly payment of £130-147 extra of interest - as opposed to an overpayment of that amount in pure capital thereby affecting the progression to lower LTVs. Therefore even if you overpay by £130-147 a month on the 2.94% you're only bringing yourself down to the initial position of being on 2.04%.
Just goes to show you can't beat the rate really - an expensive learning curve.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
