We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Central Heating System broken when inspected after buying.
Comments
-
I suspect you’re unfamiliar with Scots Law as well.Irishpearce26 said:I would bite the bullet and get a decent boiler put in on the cost of the seller and pay for the pipe upgrade. Legally the seller doesn't have to tell you if anything is working or not its up to the buyer to figure this out through surveys. As another poster said its lucky this happened within your warranty timescale.1 -
From edition 3 of the standard clauses (edition 4 coming into effect March 2021) for those unfamiliar with Scots Law.4 CENTRAL HEATING, SYSTEMS AND APPLIANCES4.1 The Seller undertakes that any systems or appliances of a working nature (including central heating, water, drainage, electric and gas) forming part of the Property or included in the Price will be in working order commensurate with age as at the Date of Settlement.4.2 The Seller will make good any defect which prevents any system or appliance being in such order provided said defect is intimated in writing within 5 working days of settlement. Failing such intimation, the Purchaser will be deemed to be satisfied as to the position.4.3 The Seller will only be responsible for carrying out any necessary repairs to put any system or appliance into such order and shall have no liability for any element of upgrading (except to the extent such upgrading is required to put any such system or appliance into such order).4.4 The lack of any regular service or maintenance of any system or appliance or the fact that it may no longer comply with current installation regulations shall not, of itself, be deemed to be a defect.4.5 The Purchaser shall be entitled to execute any necessary repairs at the expense of the Seller without reference to the Seller or the Seller’s tradesmen (i) in the event of an emergency; (ii) in the event that the Seller’s tradesmen do not inspect the alleged defects within 5 working days of intimation; or (iii) in the event that any necessary repairs are not carried out within 5 working days of inspection.4.6 The Seller confirms that he has received no notice or intimation from any third party that any system (or any part thereof) is in an unsafe or dangerous condition.4
-
Thanks LOV - seems clear from OP's point of view.
1 -
If only we could have these same t and c's south of the border! Clause 4.5 is particularly beneficial. That would appear to be game, set and match to the OP. 'System' clearly includes components external to the boiler, so covers the pump and supply pipework. Pump is a replacement, as is the gas valve; not an upgrade. Pipe is an upgrade; if it was legal at install, it is undersized now, and the RGI cannot recommission the boiler now knowing it to be so. So that's a necessary upgrade within the terms of the warranty.
OP, I'd push for the full cost of the above, and then spend it on a new boiler and the necessary supply upgrade. Better than wasting money on having the gas valve replaced on a boiler that is probably on it's last legs anyway.The only problem with those terms is that it prescribes no remedy if the vendor fails to pay up, so presumably you have to sue them anyway?
No free lunch, and no free laptop
2 -
I didn't realise it was so different to English law. Wish we had the same rights.Lover_of_Lycra said:From edition 3 of the standard clauses (edition 4 coming into effect March 2021) for those unfamiliar with Scots Law.4 CENTRAL HEATING, SYSTEMS AND APPLIANCES4.1 The Seller undertakes that any systems or appliances of a working nature (including central heating, water, drainage, electric and gas) forming part of the Property or included in the Price will be in working order commensurate with age as at the Date of Settlement.4.2 The Seller will make good any defect which prevents any system or appliance being in such order provided said defect is intimated in writing within 5 working days of settlement. Failing such intimation, the Purchaser will be deemed to be satisfied as to the position.4.3 The Seller will only be responsible for carrying out any necessary repairs to put any system or appliance into such order and shall have no liability for any element of upgrading (except to the extent such upgrading is required to put any such system or appliance into such order).4.4 The lack of any regular service or maintenance of any system or appliance or the fact that it may no longer comply with current installation regulations shall not, of itself, be deemed to be a defect.4.5 The Purchaser shall be entitled to execute any necessary repairs at the expense of the Seller without reference to the Seller or the Seller’s tradesmen (i) in the event of an emergency; (ii) in the event that the Seller’s tradesmen do not inspect the alleged defects within 5 working days of intimation; or (iii) in the event that any necessary repairs are not carried out within 5 working days of inspection.4.6 The Seller confirms that he has received no notice or intimation from any third party that any system (or any part thereof) is in an unsafe or dangerous condition.
The only thing I can see here is the pipes are still in working order (albeit old as hell) and this could be the sticking point with the sellers stating that the new boiler will work with the old pipes as stated in 4.3. Again my understanding here is limited but just hazarding a guess. We are buying a house with the existing boiler (22 years old) which is a part exchange with a developer, i asked if we could have £3k off the price to ensure we had a working heating system which they granted.0 -
Maybe propose to the sellers to have an independent plumber come and assess the pipes to confirm they are no longer fit for purpose. Are the sellers aware of the rights that @Lover_of_Lycra published? Maybe show them and highlight were they have no choice. Good luck i hope you get the outcome you deserve.0
-
An RGI has already inspected the system and decommissioned it due to the defects shown. No sane RGI will recommission it with an undersized supply, as he'd be fully legally liable for the ensuing disaster. The corrosion visible only strengthens that risk.
So, yes it 'will work' with a new boiler, but it's not going to happen: the upgrade is allowed for in the warranty because it is necessary to recommission the system legally. Clause 4.3 is unequivocal on this point:
4.3 The Seller will only be responsible for carrying out any necessary repairs to put any system or appliance into such order and shall have no liability for any element of upgrading (except to the extent such upgrading is required to put any such system or appliance into such order).
The OP#s conveyancer/solicitor simply needs to advise the vendor of their contractual committment, and the consequences of non-compliance. Of course, they may wish to compromise somewhere, but on the basis of the evidence presented, I would say that their case for the full cost is near water-tight.
No free lunch, and no free laptop
1 -
See what your conveyancer says OP. There probably is some scope for negotiation - you'll probably want a quality system put in, while the seller will want to pay for the cheapest possible thing that meets their obligations...and extracting money from people can be a pain if they drag their feet. Hope you're able to get it sorted quickly and to your satisfaction!
By the way, your solicitor did well to keep that clause in the missives
0 -
" No ventilation in current back boiler "
Are you saying this is a back boiler ( tank ) in the chimney breast ?
Pipes not correct size ?
With a new modern combi boiler your now need a larger supply pipe 22mm I believe ( please feel free to correct me )
It is more energy efficient but needs a large gas pipe !
I think the seller knew there were problems with the old central heating hence trying to remove the 7 day guarantee from the documents.
I can only recommend Worcester Bosch or Vailliant boiler as Which best buys.
Welcome to the world of Home ownership0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
