We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Estate rent charge - last minute sale issue
Comments
-
Hi Annianni_ said:I think it’s all going to go wrong with this buyer.Unless I’m lucky and their lender accepts an indemnity policy the time scales will push everyone out of the stamp duty holiday. Looking at that list plenty of lenders won’t accept an indemnity policyIt seems like the issue is because I didn’t even know it existed or was a problem? If I’d known in good time I could of got terms and conditions from the HA? It looks like they can amend their terms to say they won’t invoke a lease without informing the lender? Is that right? Should my solicitor have picked up on it as part of my sale? She said she was surprised they were making a fuss out of it. Lots of the stuff I read relates to new builds but my house was built in the 80’s and first brought from the HA in 1991. There were two owners before us.If it all falls apart I’ll feel so guilty for the whole chain ☹️.
Did your "sale story" finished well? Indemnity policy was enough for lender? I have same issue now, luckly my solicitor obtained insurance, awaiting now for lender to come back...
Thanks!0 -
I've just been hit by this whilst going through my re-mortgage. I've done some research just to get clued up on things, I'll try to list what I've gathered below (thoughtcrimes bear with me as I tend to babble!:mwbrown85 said:- The Rent Charge is something from a Rent Owner, in my case this is separate from the Ground rent and Service charge that I pay annually. However I believe it's covered under one of those payments
- It's typically in the region of £10-£20PA
- If you fail to pay it the Rent owner has the right to re-enter, and to lease the freehold
- If you own the freehold you can redeem (own) the rent charge for around 16-17 times the annual charge. I haven't read anything to suggest that leaseholders can do this
Nationwide it seems is more stringent on it's lending, and requires an Indemnity policy in place before they will offer you a mortgage (though my paper work to sign is sitting on my desk so I'm not sure about that - I have yet to buy a policy yet I can sign the mortgage now?).
Anyway, the Indemnity policy is something that apparently some lenders require so that if you (the leesee of the freehold) fails to pay the Rent charge, it prevents the Rent owner from effectively seizing the asset (your house), so that the lender isn't out of pocket. For example, if you had no policy, and you failed to pay, the Rent owner *could* take the land back, including anything built on it (your house) and not only you would be out of somewhere to live, but the lender would be out of pocket too. This is what I'm led to believe *could* happen. I haven't gone as far to review any cases such as this, however to me the wording seems to imply it.
My new mortgage is with Nationwide. I've read that Barclays and Nationwide are more on top of these things and require an indemnity policy before they lend to you. From what I can tell this seems to be a recent thing in the last couple of years, which may explain why I was never hit with this before. My previous lender, Natwest, either isn't fussed or two years ago it wasn't a big an issue that it is now.
In summary, it's really irritating. You already pay a Rent charge, yet you now need insurance *because* you pay this charge. The result is you're shafted on both sides. The policy is pretty quick to set up, but it's still a cost (mine's looking to be £150). However, I'm aware that it's an annual policy and will of couse need to be factored into any re-sale (along with the Rent charge, ground rent, service charge).
Buying a house is fun, honest...
Small edit, I've found this the details which lenders require certain things: https://lendershandbook.ukfinance.org.uk/lenders-handbook/englandandwales/question-list/1865/0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards