We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Does anyone hold a LISA with EQi?

2»

Comments

  • Alexland
    Alexland Posts: 10,561 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 26 January 2021 at 2:11PM
    VLS60 seems a bit tame for a 20 year investment. Also if you did transfer the LISA out don't forget to close the dealing account..
  • Alexland said:
    VLS60 seems a bit tame for a 20 year investment. Also if you did transfer the LISA out don't forget to close the dealing account..
    I considered 80/20 but it's just my attitude to risk at the moment! Could potentially change, will reconsider options for the 10 years from 50 to 60 when can no longer contribute as well
  • Alexland
    Alexland Posts: 10,561 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 26 January 2021 at 2:55PM
    I considered 80/20 but it's just my attitude to risk at the moment! Could potentially change, will reconsider options for the 10 years from 50 to 60 when can no longer contribute as well
    This article might help. With 20 years ahead that's probably a couple of economic cycles so if you grow a hard skin to the volatility and focus on the long term positive outcome it seems a shame to be holding such a high proportion of low return bonds. It would be better to derisk as you approach withdrawal not the other way around. I'm happier when markets have crashed as it means my contributions are buying a greater number of cheaper units. I am primarily a unit collector not a capital seller. Just remember that when prices are low that's what other people are selling at - you would only sell when prices are high again.

  • Alexland said:
    I considered 80/20 but it's just my attitude to risk at the moment! Could potentially change, will reconsider options for the 10 years from 50 to 60 when can no longer contribute as well
    This article might help. With 20 years ahead that's probably a couple of economic cycles so if you grow a hard skin to the volatility and focus on the long term positive outcome it seems a shame to be holding such a high proportion of low return bonds. It would be better to derisk as you approach withdrawal not the other way around. I'm happier when markets have crashed as it means my contributions are buying a greater number of cheaper units. I am primarily a unit collector not a capital seller. Just remember that when prices are low that's what other people are selling at - you would only sell when prices are high again.

    I absolutely agree, I understand the long term potential benefits and my plan is to potentially de-risk further as I near withdrawal, the 60/40 is based on my own risk attitude and circumstances etc. It probably is over cautious at the moment but I am fairly new to investing and suits at the moment. I did look at the Vanguard Retirement Funds that de-risk for you as you approach a specified date but settled on the 60/40 for now
  • Alexland
    Alexland Posts: 10,561 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    OldManLogan said:
    I did look at the Vanguard Retirement Funds that de-risk for you as you approach a specified date but settled on the 60/40 for now
    Your ideal asset allocation glidepath depends what you will do at 60. VTR2040 is currently 74% equities which still seems a bit light for 20 years and it would reduce to 50% equities by the time you are 60 which might be good for a total withdrawal but seems light for sustainable drawdown of inflation linked income. With current bond prices its hard to see how a 60/40 fund will deliver much more than inflation after fees. Equities are also expensive but at least they are likely to deliver an above inflation return if you can stomach the volatility.
  • Alexland said:
    OldManLogan said:
    I did look at the Vanguard Retirement Funds that de-risk for you as you approach a specified date but settled on the 60/40 for now
    Your ideal asset allocation glidepath depends what you will do at 60. VTR2040 is currently 74% equities which still seems a bit light for 20 years and it would reduce to 50% equities by the time you are 60 which might be good for a total withdrawal but seems light for sustainable drawdown of inflation linked income. With current bond prices its hard to see how a 60/40 fund will deliver much more than inflation after fees. Equities are also expensive but at least they are likely to deliver an above inflation return if you can stomach the volatility.
    My main aim is to beat inflation with modest growth/return, I'll be honest I hadn't really considered a drawdown income so need to look into that more. Thanks for all of your help, lot to consider. First thing I need to decide when/if to transfer to AJ Bell, probably worth it long term with uncertainty around II price structure. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.