We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Tracker offer worse than fixed? And fees vs no fees.

Options
If someone could double check this here - I am used to seeing trackers being a better % (at the start at least) than the fixed package for the same period.
Currently the offer from Nationwide stands at 2yrs fixed 1.49% or 2yrs variable 1.79% (base+1.69).
Am I understanding this wrong? As I don't see variable working out better unless base goes to minus numbers, and that's if they would even drop below their number if base rate was below 0% ?

So I went to compare the 2 year fixed, up front fee and no fee. Their pages make it seem cheaper to pay a fee but I think it would be better to go no-fee and just pay the fee equivalent to lower the balance day one (no compound on that amount too).
In their own comparisons, they add the fees onto how much you will pay, but the fee doesn't come off the balance so its not a fair comparison?
If I take 999 off the current balance at the bottom on the no-fee column, the calculation drops a lot more.
This seems so obviously wrong to me, that I feel that I'm completely missing something myself?




Comments

  • K_S
    K_S Posts: 6,877 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    If someone could double check this here - I am used to seeing trackers being a better % (at the start at least) than the fixed package for the same period.
    Currently the offer from Nationwide stands at 2yrs fixed 1.49% or 2yrs variable 1.79% (base+1.69).
    @drsquirrel Comparing the Nationwide fixed and tracker product, the tracker is bound to be a bit more expensive as it offers a lot more flexibility than the fixed product. You can pay off any amount ERC-free, switch products to another Nationwide product at any time, remortgage away to another lender at any time, etc. The trade-off is that you pay a bit of premium in the interest rate.

    I am a Mortgage Adviser - You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. 

    PLEASE DO NOT SEND PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.

  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    The fee is cheaper. 

    Look at the difference in payment and the amount owing with the fee added. 
    £640-£397~=£243 cheaper. 

    To do it properly you need to make the payment the same.

    Any mortgage over £150k and 6y full term is cheaper with the fee unless planing big overpayments. 
  • drsquirrel
    drsquirrel Posts: 283 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 18 January 2021 at 10:12PM
    Where did you get the 640/397 from?
    I do plan to make overpayments, of almost double (which I do now, and is still under the 10% of original loan luckily) though I was indeed looking at the values they gave.

    The way I was looking at it was the balance after 2 years are 152,027 and ,564 so £537 difference - but the balance would be 999 lower to start with for the higher one so would then make it cheaper(and more so with compound savings on the 999).

  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    edited 18 January 2021 at 10:20PM
    I said,  it's for the column with fee added and no fee. 
    the differences in payments
    The difference in the amount owing. 
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    Would need to work it out for a payment around £1200
  • drsquirrel
    drsquirrel Posts: 283 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 18 January 2021 at 11:27PM
    I'm aware of that - I was trying to calculate them as is before adding on the extra complication of overpayments. But as I'm doing so badly right now I have thrown these 2 into the MSE calculator...

    Overpayment (end of year 2)
    140,905 - 139,685 = 1220 - 999 = £221

    No overpayment (end of year 2)
    152,348 − 151,811 = 537 - 999 = -£462
    With the overpayment(to make up £1100) the fee looks better - but without it still looks worse as I seemed to think before?

    1.09% /w fee(999)
    Year 0    £162,754    £162,754
    Year 1    £157,313    £151,282
    Year 2    £151,811    £139,685

    1.49% /wo fee(0)
    Year 0    £162,754    £162,754
    Year 1    £157,590    £151,911
    Year 2    £152,348    £140,905

    Edit: I just made the same mistake again on the non overpayment because there are 2 different monthly payments.

    The compare 2 mortgages calculator helps with this. Although I can't figure out how to compare it with an overpayment too.
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    Most calculators comparisons are not good,  the MSE one has a lot of errors in some of its comparisons and can be misleading.

    best avoided.

    paying the fee upfront makes a small difference to the calculations so unless very close you don't need to do that one.
    It's just another overpayment you have the money or you don't

    we can ignore term as it is the payment that matters.

    bigger the payment the smaller saving from paying the fee.

    Like for like cash flow, same cash starting point and same payment see what's left

    using the same 2 payments £620(1.49%)  with overpayment £1200)
    (edit I missed you are using 1100  makes a tiny difference)
    add fee £620pm  
    £163754 1.09% £620pm £152,324.90  (-£255)
    £162754 1.49% £620pm £152,579.54
    pay fee £620pm
    £162754 1.09% £620pm £151,302.87 (-£236)
    £161754 1.49% £620pm £151,549.31
    add fee £1200pm
    £163754 1.09% £1200pm £138,258.52 (-£200)
    £162754 1.49% £1200pm £138,458.95
    pay fee £1200pm
    £162754 1.09% £1200pm £137,236.49 (-£192)
    £161754 1.49% £1200pm £137,428.72

    Over 2 years the difference is not that much

    the breakeven payment  is over £3300pm

    As I said any mortgage over £150k over 6 years full term the fee option is better.

    The NO fee comes into play around £125k mortgage size.
    (can have a proper look later)
    ................................................................................................
    Not what you asked but worth a look
     
    It will be worth running the 1.24% 5y fix option against multiple 2year deals as you will have another fee and rates might go up the slightly higher cost in the first 2 years will be recovered.
    on the 1200pm payment the 0.15% extra  will cost around £460 for first 2 years( less in the second 2) so quite close but a saving if rates don't drop.

     unless you need to stick with the 2 years for other reasons that looks like a decent option.



  • ................................................................................................
    Not what you asked but worth a look
     
    It will be worth running the 1.24% 5y fix option against multiple 2year deals as you will have another fee and rates might go up the slightly higher cost in the first 2 years will be recovered.
    on the 1200pm payment the 0.15% extra  will cost around £460 for first 2 years( less in the second 2) so quite close but a saving if rates don't drop.

     unless you need to stick with the 2 years for other reasons that looks like a decent option.


    Thanks for this part - I had started looking at that since their 5y rate is lower than the 3y and it seems to make sense. Even if rates go down its not going to be a massive difference I feel - so I am looking at this at the moment. There is something to be said about not having to decide every 2 years too...

    Thanks for the help/checks.

    K_S said:
    @drsquirrel Comparing the Nationwide fixed and tracker product, the tracker is bound to be a bit more expensive as it offers a lot more flexibility than the fixed product. You can pay off any amount ERC-free, switch products to another Nationwide product at any time, remortgage away to another lender at any time, etc. The trade-off is that you pay a bit of premium in the interest rate.
    Thanks - I had noticed this after and its one reason I went variable before, any overpayment. I was mistakenly made to believe that it was 10% of the annual payment not 10% of the original loan, so this isn't a problem for me now. Last time though (x2) the variable deal I got was cheaper than the fixed, first time I've seen it higher.


  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    Quick update have my spreadsheet handy.
    for 1.09% £999 fee 1.49% over 2 years the break even point
    Full term  mortgage size needed
    5 £154,965.82
    10 £138,501.50
    15 £133,764.13
    20 £131,517.37
    25 £130,207.48
    30 £129,350.62
    IO £126,297.79


     
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.