We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Possible subsidence. How concerned should I be?
Options
Comments
-
tui85 said:tui85 said:KJIWTIStructE said:This extension looks quite poor. The crack is located where the wall is weak due to the window, the small panel below the cill takes very little load. Hopefully the corner has a post where the windows meet, who on earth puts windows around a corner looking into a neighbor's garden? Looks like they came by some spare double glazing and cobbled together a dodgy extension, sorry but it is bad...
1. The sliding doors upstairs indicate the roof is used in some way. There is no barrier so this is possibly illegal, plus the roof probably isn't designed for the imposed loading that walking on it would apply, not saying it will fail but the finished might and then it will leak.
2. Whole thing looks damp.
3. Does it have planning and building regs?
I would not buy it but if you really like the house get a full structural survey of the whole thing and try to get someone with a damp meter also.
1. There is no post in the corner where the windows meet. It's all window....
2. Our builder suggested that the roof would be fine to use for walking, sitting, laying decking etc. But I'm beginning to wonder if perhaps he just wanted us to buy the house so that he could complete all of the work he suggested we have done! The roof has leaked in the past and has been repaired (to what standard I don't know)
3. What in particular makes you say that the whole thing.looks damp? Aside from the evidence of damp proofing?
4. No record of planning permission with the council, but have been advised by council that planning permission may not have been required, and due to it's age (80s), even if it was built without permission, that would no longer be an issue.
5. Anything else indicating that the extension is "bad"? Any other general thoughts? Feels a real stroke of luck to have a structural engineer on here :-)
We'll be getting a structural surveyor out ASAP.
Many thanks1 -
tui85 said:KJIWTIStructE said:This extension looks quite poor. The crack is located where the wall is weak due to the window, the small panel below the cill takes very little load. Hopefully the corner has a post where the windows meet, who on earth puts windows around a corner looking into a neighbor's garden? Looks like they came by some spare double glazing and cobbled together a dodgy extension, sorry but it is bad...
1. The sliding doors upstairs indicate the roof is used in some way. There is no barrier so this is possibly illegal, plus the roof probably isn't designed for the imposed loading that walking on it would apply, not saying it will fail but the finished might and then it will leak.
2. Whole thing looks damp.
3. Does it have planning and building regs?
I would not buy it but if you really like the house get a full structural survey of the whole thing and try to get someone with a damp meter also.
1. There is no post in the corner where the windows meet. It's all window....
2. Our builder suggested that the roof would be fine to use for walking, sitting, laying decking etc. But I'm beginning to wonder if perhaps he just wanted us to buy the house so that he could complete all of the work he suggested we have done! The roof has leaked in the past and has been repaired (to what standard I don't know)
3. What in particular makes you say that the whole thing.looks damp? Aside from the evidence of damp proofing?
4. No record of planning permission with the council, but have been advised by council that planning permission may not have been required, and due to it's age (80s), even if it was built without permission, that would no longer be an issue.
5. Anything else indicating that the extension is "bad"? Any other general thoughts? Feels a real stroke of luck to have a structural engineer on here :-)
We'll be getting a structural surveyor out ASAP.
Many thanks
Ouch.
Options-
1. Walk away
2. Plan on demolishing the extension. Adjust your price accordingly.
Seriously, it's not structurally sound. The crack is just indicative of a bigger problem. uPVC windows, aren't strong enough to hold up a roof- let alone one people may walk on. that thing is so far from complying with either planning or building regs. Just no.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards