We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Should I have paid stamp duty when buying my ex-husband out of our home?
Options
Comments
-
the key to your scenario is the fact you were a joint purchaser with another person
as SDLT geek says, that cancels out the exemption that would have applied had you been the sole purchaser due to a court order (and within the timescale allowed as part of a divorce settlement)
neither of you own a different property so the additional rate SDLT does not apply
the dates you quote means, as geek says, the standard rate applies, hence you (as joint purchasers) had to pay as you personally already owned a property and therefore prevented you as a pair of purchasers from claiming first time buyer relief
references:
Beware: Tax traps on separation and divorce - Cripps Pemberton Greenish (crippspg.co.uk)A Court Order
If a couple are considering a judicial form of separation – a divorce, an annulment, a judicial separation, or a separation order – and they agree one or more property transactions in relation to that event, no SDLT will be payable so long as the couple are the only parties to the transactions and the transactions are either- ordered by the court or
- agreed between the couple before or after the court process, but in contemplation of or in connection with it. As the agreement relates to property it must be a formal written agreement signed by both
Chapter 3 - Definition of a first time buyer
In order to count as a first time buyer, a purchaser must not, either alone or with others, have previously acquired a major interest in a dwelling or an equivalent interest in land situated anywhere in the world.
I appreciate that is clear as mud, but "major interest" does not mean you own x%, it simply means: you own a property - full stop. Which is what you already did, you were joint owner with your ex. That fact you were buying an additional share in that property reinforces the fact you already own a property5
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards