QDR Solicitors "FORMAL LETTER OF CLAIM"

Redx

If they failed to supply the pdt records for your vehicle , reply and give them 7 days to comply or you will complain to the ICO ll

Then complain to the ICO if they refuse or ignore your request

This can also be brought up in court

Just assume that you will bring up all issues in court , no what ifs , just do

Coupon-mad

Ask QDR to disclose the machine records, as part of the requirements of the pre-action protocol for debt claims. 

Obviously, don't ring them (when I say ''ask'' I don't mean phone a scammer or debt recovery robo-claim 'legal' firm).

nosferatu1001

When you said "car out of bay" - how badly? 
Not ina  bay at all
Wheel fully over into another bay
Wheel on line / just over
Give us some ideas. 

Ralph-y

all so ....

"Has my SAR been completed though as they haven't provided the PDT machine records.  I'm certain that I paid for parking on each one of the days of the tickets. "

is this not irrelevant if the 'claim is for parked out of a bay ' ?

can you give a break down yet of the amounts being claimed ?

Ralph

B2lal

Redx said:

If they failed to supply the pdt records for your vehicle , reply and give them 7 days to comply or you will complain to the ICO ll

Then complain to the ICO if they refuse or ignore your request

This can also be brought up in court

Just assume that you will bring up all issues in court , no what ifs , just do

I sent them a message saying this and the DPO responded saying they have 30 days to comply from the date of the original message

B2lal

Coupon-mad said:

Ask QDR to disclose the machine records, as part of the requirements of the pre-action protocol for debt claims. 

Obviously, don't ring them (when I say ''ask'' I don't mean phone a scammer or debt recovery robo-claim 'legal' firm).

I should ask QDR for the machine records or NPC?

nosferatu1001 said:

When you said "car out of bay" - how badly? 
Not ina  bay at all
Wheel fully over into another bay
Wheel on line / just over
Give us some ideas. 

Not in a bay at all, but in an empty unmarked space that was not in the way of any footpaths or traffic or even blocking any cars in.Ralph-y said:

all so ....

"Has my SAR been completed though as they haven't provided the PDT machine records.  I'm certain that I paid for parking on each one of the days of the tickets. "

is this not irrelevant if the 'claim is for parked out of a bay ' ?

can you give a break down yet of the amounts being claimed ?

Ralph

It probably is irrelevant, maybe i'm clutching at straws.  I thought that maybe if i show i've paid for each of the days even though my car was not in a bay but also not obstructing anything else.  Its £196 per ticket.  Thats £100 for the original ticket and then zzps have added their charges on top.

Coupon-mad

I told you who to ask under the PAP and I explained what the PAP was.

nosferatu1001

Well NPC are the ones witht he PDT records, but Im not sure what you expect the records to prove. I fail to see the connection. 
I'd suggest you get photos, because we've had "not in a bay" before, and photos photos photos required.

B2lal

nosferatu1001 said:

Well NPC are the ones witht he PDT records, but Im not sure what you expect the records to prove. I fail to see the connection. 
I'd suggest you get photos, because we've had "not in a bay" before, and photos photos photos required.

They've sent all the photos already and they clearly show the vehicle not in a marked bay

nosferatu1001

That's not why we need to see photos.