We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Visibility splay on front garden
Options
Comments
-
Yes - what you are buying is contained within those red lines, but an adverse possession claim may be possible on the rest of it.
You will need to make your solicitor aware of this, if you haven't already (I presume the plan came from them, but you could have downloaded it yourself which is why I'm making this point).1 -
I had a similar issue with the first house I bought. Part of the side and front garden belonged to the council (even though a private house) as they wished this to remain as a visibility splay or to widen the road (it was only access to garage blocks, so never going to happen). Never a problem. Myself, previous and successive owners just treated it as if they owned itIf you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales1
-
The visibility splay will have been a planning requirement so traffic can see safely.So you can probably enjoy the use of the garden and keep on mowing the grass, but you can't plant anything there which is probably why the developer kept it to be able to enforce that.It is a bit of grass on an open plan estate, just what else do you want to do with it other than mow the grass?You won't be able to claim adverse possession as it is unfenced and so others can walk on it so you have not had exclusive use of it.2
-
anne_stroud said:We are not buying from developers, think there have been two or three owners already since house was built. I don't know how much value to put on it, but we don't have the front garden that we thought we had with this house, and we are nearvous if this issue will have impact when we try to sell later on. I'm assuming visibility splays are quite commonplace, but to be honest we never heard of it before..1
-
Just do as the current owners have done. Look after it with mowing and planiting of low plants that don't obstruct visibility, and in a year or two you also will have forgotten you do not own it.
1 -
The sellers solicitor has stated, "if the area has since been incorporated as part of the front garden, then perhaps the buyers would be willing to accept a Statutory Declaration from xxx to that effect". Our solicitor has said that they've only been there since 2017 and it's a long way off being to claim possessory. She mentioned 10 years, so I'm assuming that's when we could apply to purchase it. But also it's unlikely that the Highways would sell it to us. Does anyone know if the Highways ever sell these strips of land to adjacent property owners? I understand that you cannot grow hedges or put up fence above certain height etc. ...but do they ever sell with that understanding. And how much £ are we talking about?
0 -
So does the land belong to the original builders, as earlier stated, or Highways?
Just thinking that it might be easier if you could buy from the builders and take over their undertakings re permanent visibility responsibilities.2 -
It looks like it is still owned by the builders. I did read on one of the documents ....to be adopted by the local authority. But maybe it was not in reference to this bit of land. Those documents are hard to read, and the jargon is not easy for someone not in this area of expertise.0
-
anne_stroud said:It looks like it is still owned by the builders. I did read on one of the documents ....to be adopted by the local authority. But maybe it was not in reference to this bit of land. Those documents are hard to read, and the jargon is not easy for someone not in this area of expertise.0
-
anne_stroud said:It looks like it is still owned by the builders. I did read on one of the documents ....to be adopted by the local authority. But maybe it was not in reference to this bit of land.Those documents are hard to read, and the jargon is not easy for someone not in this area of expertise.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards