We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
structural engineers report: who is responsible?
theGrinch
Posts: 3,133 Forumite
I am in the process of purchasing a flat (top floor on 3 storey building). There are 2 other flats both owned by the freeholder.
The valuer's report has noted structural movement to the front elevation and bay window. It is now a condition of the mortgage that a structural engineers report be submitted. Of course, I could just pay £350 and get it done but....
My question is is it reasonable to invite the freeholder to commission this report not only in their capacity of being responsible for the building but also as they acutally own the flat being affect? In addition, is this report (and any works) not something they could undertake through their building insurance?
Not keen to throw good money after bad.
Thanks
The valuer's report has noted structural movement to the front elevation and bay window. It is now a condition of the mortgage that a structural engineers report be submitted. Of course, I could just pay £350 and get it done but....
My question is is it reasonable to invite the freeholder to commission this report not only in their capacity of being responsible for the building but also as they acutally own the flat being affect? In addition, is this report (and any works) not something they could undertake through their building insurance?
Not keen to throw good money after bad.
Thanks
"enough is a feast"...old Buddist proverb
0
Comments
-
Is the freeholder the current owner?
If so, you have a fair chance, depends on how keen they are to sell.
If not, its reasonable to ask, however dont be suprised if you get a firm no. You may have more of a chance if you negotiate with the current owners.
I would ask - no harm in it - let us know how you do.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards