We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Residential nil rate band transfer
Comments
-
Have you read the HMRC manual guidance on residential nil rate band
IHTM46000 - Inheritance Tax Manual - HMRC internal manual - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
0 -
If you are going to need RNRB on B's death then if A died less than 2 years I think there is a window to reduce the asset base without loss of transferable nil rate band by utilising A's RNRB transferring up to £175k worth of property or assets to a qualifying beneficiary of A.0
-
hi i am reading it as we speak. It does not state however if to claim rnrb / downsizing one needs to fill iht400 even if there is no tax to pay. I guess iht400 needs doing if iht435 is submitted.tiengomar said:but is the transferred allowance from spouse A and allowance available to Spouse B limited by the fact that spouse B then needs to nominate the property it applies to or can then difference between the RNRB allowances then be applied to the rest of the assets held by Spouse B?0 -
tiengomar said:ok many thanks for all your replies.
so the best solution appears to be that it would be worth making a deed of variation to redirect home of spouse A to child and claim downsizing allowance and transfer this to surviving spouse.
You are now talking about something different to the situation that started this thread, and now, having seen your previous posts, I can see why.
However I think you might be better giving a complete factually description of the current situation in one post. It would be easier to understand what actions you have in mind.
0 -
I wasn't deliberately trying to mislead.naedanger said:tiengomar said:ok many thanks for all your replies.
so the best solution appears to be that it would be worth making a deed of variation to redirect home of spouse A to child and claim downsizing allowance and transfer this to surviving spouse.
You are now talking about something different to the situation that started this thread, and now, having seen your previous posts, I can see why.
However I think you might be better giving a complete factually description of the current situation in one post. It would be easier to understand what actions you have in mind.
Here is the situation.
spouse A has died with a property in her name worth around 90k and cash of 320k. Downsized from a property 265k two years ago.
spouse B has a house in his name worth 150k and cash worth 400k.
So the aim is to maximize allowances to include use of each RNRB.
Spouse B currently inherits Spouse A estate but happy to change with DOV if it helps with tax.0 -
I didn't think you were trying to mislead, it is often better to simplify situations.
Did spouse B ever own the £265k property, and did spouse B ever live in it?0 -
no they have always kept houses in separate names.naedanger said:I didn't think you were trying to mislead, it is often better to simplify situations.
Did spouse B ever own the £265k property, and did spouse B ever live in it?
yes spouse b lived in spouse A's home and viceversa.0 -
Then I don't think your idea will work. I cannot see how spouse B can claim they ever owned the £265k property.tiengomar said:
no they have always kept houses in separate names.naedanger said:I didn't think you were trying to mislead, it is often better to simplify situations.
Did spouse B ever own the £265k property, and did spouse B ever live in it?
yes spouse b lived in spouse A's home and viceversa.0 -
so even a dov to the child now to cover the house will not help in the claim for rnrb to add to the nrb transferred to the existing spouse?naedanger said:
Then I don't think your idea will work. I cannot see how spouse B can claim they ever owned the £265k property.tiengomar said:
no they have always kept houses in separate names.naedanger said:I didn't think you were trying to mislead, it is often better to simplify situations.
Did spouse B ever own the £265k property, and did spouse B ever live in it?
yes spouse b lived in spouse A's home and viceversa.0 -
No, it will not help as far as I can see.tiengomar said:
so even a dov to the child now to cover the house will not help in the claim for rnrb to add to the nrb transferred to the existing spouse?naedanger said:
Then I don't think your idea will work. I cannot see how spouse B can claim they ever owned the £265k property.tiengomar said:
no they have always kept houses in separate names.naedanger said:I didn't think you were trying to mislead, it is often better to simplify situations.
Did spouse B ever own the £265k property, and did spouse B ever live in it?
yes spouse b lived in spouse A's home and viceversa.
Sorry- previous text was wrong.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards