DCB Legal Letter Before Claim Highview Parking

Bluefeather

Jenni_D said:

Bluefeather said:

I have proved it's at least the payment terms now is the appeal process an extension.

Have you? All you've done is explain your reasoning, not proven anything. I'd say a High Court decision trumps your belief.

Castle said:

The High Court found it was on the date of completion of the work or service, rather than the payment due date in:-
Ice Architects Ltd v Empowering People Inspiring Communities (Rev 1) [2018] EWHC 281 (QB) (16 February 2018) (bailii.org)

Is it or is it not a money claim for a debt? 

If the parking was bought and there were issues then that is a claim on date the person paid for it.

Here it's debt. CCJ credit history.... proof that it's debt not a claim in contract for a service.

The case is about money owed but as they had part paid the debt was set at work commencement date as the credit terms were vague on when balances due. 

"Epic will endeavour to pay within 30 days.." 

Debt was acknowledged. PCN cases not so. As debt acknowledge by part payment then it reverts according to the statute to the invoice date section 29 of the Act 

For PCN it's clear payment due in 14/28 days or as per appeal terms

Did you read case or just web searched saw summary and charged ahead... 

Jenni_D

In your opinion ... where's your proof?

Others are of the opinion that the cause of action starts on the date the PCN is issued, and @Castle has offered proof to support that opinion.

nosferatu1001

Yep, as above, you havent yet proven anything. 

Fruitcake

I'll leave further discussion to the forum regulars who I know are legally trained and/or qualified.

Jenni_D

I agree. (The reply above (first on this page) was heavily edited after myself and @nosferatu1001 had posted). As of right now he (gender assumed) is still spouting an opinion with no proof.

Bluefeather

It 's debt yes or no

If debt have proved it's not the invoice date but down to time to pay terms as backed up by case law. 

Please prove it's not debt. I have given

links to others that are of view it is debt. 
and
the non payment of PCN that is decided by a court resultis in CCJ that can affect Credit Rating

So far no proof it's not debt. You must prove the defendant has breached terms of supply of goods or services to the claimant. Which you cannot. 

nosferatu1001

It's also not relevant right now. 
The C themselves take date of breach as date of contract, evidenced multiple times.

Jenni_D

Bluefeather said:

It 's debt yes or no

No ... the nearest it can be argued is as an alleged debt.

D_P_Dance

It is only a debt if a judge says ir is.

Bluefeather

At last we are in agreement and the time limit on going to court to establish (contract debt) ie. if there is a contract or terms to void is..... from the start of cause of action plus 6 years. When monet is claimed is end of time to pay 
end of time to appeal 
last letter disputing amount vs just denying claim

That cause of action day could be much later than you think.